[sv-dc] RE: Back annotation with/without deferred resolution function association

From: Lear, Jim <Jim.Lear@cirrus.com>
Date: Thu Feb 10 2011 - 09:28:36 PST

Just to be clear, I do not see a reason we must have resolution functions tied to nets rather than resolution functions tied to types. Hence, I cannot rationalize a reason for deferred binding of resolution functions.

As far as resolution modules, I believe we should exhaust state free resolution function possibilities. Resolution module proposals should be postponed until after state-free resolution functions have been introduced into products and thoroughly explored by users.

Kindest Regards,

Jim Lear

Cirrus Logic

(512) 851-4612

(512) 293-7248 (mobile)

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Thu Feb 10 09:29:11 2011

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Feb 10 2011 - 09:29:12 PST