Re: [sv-ac] call to vote on 1756

From: Thomas Thatcher <Thomas.Thatcher_at_.....>
Date: Mon Oct 22 2007 - 10:36:19 PDT
I vote no on 1756.

I have the same concern that Manisha expressed:  that a simulation could be
broken by a user adding a $assertoff or $assertkill at time 0.

The only reason I see that you might want to check an assertion only on the
first clock edge would be to check reset values in a design.
If the designer puts a concurrent assertion in an initial block to check reset
values, a different engineer could then add a $assertoff at time zero, and now
the assertion fires because it is evaluated long past reset.

Is there some important use model that I am missing?

Tom

John Havlicek wrote On 10/16/07 04:53 PM,:
> Hi Folks:
> 
> This is the call to vote on the proposal for Mantis 1756.
> 
> The document on Mantis is
> 
> 1756_AssertInInitialAssertoff_on.071015.pdf
> 
> Please vote if you are eligible.  See the details below.
> 
> J.H.
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Ballot on Mantis 1756
> 
> - Called on 2007-10-16, final ballots due at 2007-10-23 T 23:59-07:00.
> 
>  v[xxxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx-xx] Doron Bustan (Intel)
>  v[xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx-x] Eduard Cerny (Synopsys)     
>  n[-----------x-xxx---------x-x-xxx-x---x] Surrendra Dudani (Synopsys)
>  v[xxxx-xxxxxxxxx-xx-xxxxx-xxx-xxx-------] Yaniv Fais (Freescale)
>  t[xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] John Havlicek (Freescale - Chair)
>  v[xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxrxxxxxxxxxxxxx-xxx] Dmitry Korchemny (Intel - Co-Chair)
>  v[xxxx-xxx-x--xx--xxxxx----------xx-xxxx] Manisha Kulshrestha (Mentor Graphics)
>  n[-------------------xxxxx-------x-xx-x-] Jiang Long (Mentor Graphics)
>  n[-----------x--xxx.....................] Joseph Lu (Altera)
>  v[xxxxxxxx..............................] Johan Martensson (Jasper)
>  n[----------------x--x-xx--xx-xxxxxxx-x-] Hillel Miller (Freescale)
>  v[xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxx] Lisa Piper (Cadence)
>  v[xx-xxxxxxx-x-xxxxx-x..................] Erik Seligman (Intel)
>  n[---x--------xxxx-----xxxx-xx----------] Tej Singh (Mentor Graphics)
>  v[xxxx--xxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Bassam Tabbara (Synopsys)
>  v[xxxxxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxxx...............] Tom Thatcher (Sun Microsystems)
>    |------------------------------------- attendance on 2007-10-16
>  |--------------------------------------- voting eligibility for this ballot
> |---------------------------------------- email ballots received
> 
> 	Legend:
> 		x = attended
> 		- = missed
> 		r = represented
> 		. = not yet a member
> 		v = valid voter (2 out of last 3 or 3/4 overall)
> 		n = not valid voter
>                 t = chair eligible to vote only to make or break a tie
> 

-- 
------------------
Thomas J. Thatcher
Sun Microsystems
------------------

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Mon Oct 22 10:36:49 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Oct 22 2007 - 10:37:02 PDT