Hi Tom, but this problem exists now too, no? ed > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On > Behalf Of Thomas Thatcher > Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 1:36 PM > To: john.havlicek@freescale.com > Cc: sv-ac@eda.org > Subject: Re: [sv-ac] call to vote on 1756 > > I vote no on 1756. > > I have the same concern that Manisha expressed: that a > simulation could be > broken by a user adding a $assertoff or $assertkill at time 0. > > The only reason I see that you might want to check an > assertion only on the > first clock edge would be to check reset values in a design. > If the designer puts a concurrent assertion in an initial > block to check reset > values, a different engineer could then add a $assertoff at > time zero, and now > the assertion fires because it is evaluated long past reset. > > Is there some important use model that I am missing? > > Tom > > John Havlicek wrote On 10/16/07 04:53 PM,: > > Hi Folks: > > > > This is the call to vote on the proposal for Mantis 1756. > > > > The document on Mantis is > > > > 1756_AssertInInitialAssertoff_on.071015.pdf > > > > Please vote if you are eligible. See the details below. > > > > J.H. > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > ------------------------- > > Ballot on Mantis 1756 > > > > - Called on 2007-10-16, final ballots due at 2007-10-23 T > 23:59-07:00. > > > > v[xxxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx-xx] Doron Bustan (Intel) > > v[xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx-x] Eduard Cerny > (Synopsys) > > n[-----------x-xxx---------x-x-xxx-x---x] Surrendra Dudani > (Synopsys) > > v[xxxx-xxxxxxxxx-xx-xxxxx-xxx-xxx-------] Yaniv Fais (Freescale) > > t[xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] John Havlicek > (Freescale - Chair) > > v[xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxrxxxxxxxxxxxxx-xxx] Dmitry Korchemny > (Intel - Co-Chair) > > v[xxxx-xxx-x--xx--xxxxx----------xx-xxxx] Manisha > Kulshrestha (Mentor Graphics) > > n[-------------------xxxxx-------x-xx-x-] Jiang Long > (Mentor Graphics) > > n[-----------x--xxx.....................] Joseph Lu (Altera) > > v[xxxxxxxx..............................] Johan Martensson (Jasper) > > n[----------------x--x-xx--xx-xxxxxxx-x-] Hillel Miller (Freescale) > > v[xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxx] Lisa Piper (Cadence) > > v[xx-xxxxxxx-x-xxxxx-x..................] Erik Seligman (Intel) > > n[---x--------xxxx-----xxxx-xx----------] Tej Singh > (Mentor Graphics) > > v[xxxx--xxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Bassam Tabbara (Synopsys) > > v[xxxxxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxxx...............] Tom Thatcher > (Sun Microsystems) > > |------------------------------------- attendance on 2007-10-16 > > |--------------------------------------- voting > eligibility for this ballot > > |---------------------------------------- email ballots received > > > > Legend: > > x = attended > > - = missed > > r = represented > > . = not yet a member > > v = valid voter (2 out of last 3 or 3/4 overall) > > n = not valid voter > > t = chair eligible to vote only to make or > break a tie > > > > -- > ------------------ > Thomas J. Thatcher > Sun Microsystems > ------------------ > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Mon Oct 22 10:50:07 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Oct 22 2007 - 10:50:16 PDT