RE: [sv-ac] call to vote on 1756

From: Eduard Cerny <Eduard.Cerny_at_.....>
Date: Mon Oct 22 2007 - 10:49:29 PDT
Hi Tom,

but this problem exists now too, no?
ed 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On 
> Behalf Of Thomas Thatcher
> Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 1:36 PM
> To: john.havlicek@freescale.com
> Cc: sv-ac@eda.org
> Subject: Re: [sv-ac] call to vote on 1756
> 
> I vote no on 1756.
> 
> I have the same concern that Manisha expressed:  that a 
> simulation could be
> broken by a user adding a $assertoff or $assertkill at time 0.
> 
> The only reason I see that you might want to check an 
> assertion only on the
> first clock edge would be to check reset values in a design.
> If the designer puts a concurrent assertion in an initial 
> block to check reset
> values, a different engineer could then add a $assertoff at 
> time zero, and now
> the assertion fires because it is evaluated long past reset.
> 
> Is there some important use model that I am missing?
> 
> Tom
> 
> John Havlicek wrote On 10/16/07 04:53 PM,:
> > Hi Folks:
> > 
> > This is the call to vote on the proposal for Mantis 1756.
> > 
> > The document on Mantis is
> > 
> > 1756_AssertInInitialAssertoff_on.071015.pdf
> > 
> > Please vote if you are eligible.  See the details below.
> > 
> > J.H.
> > 
> > 
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -------------------------
> > Ballot on Mantis 1756
> > 
> > - Called on 2007-10-16, final ballots due at 2007-10-23 T 
> 23:59-07:00.
> > 
> >  v[xxxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx-xx] Doron Bustan (Intel)
> >  v[xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx-x] Eduard Cerny 
> (Synopsys)     
> >  n[-----------x-xxx---------x-x-xxx-x---x] Surrendra Dudani 
> (Synopsys)
> >  v[xxxx-xxxxxxxxx-xx-xxxxx-xxx-xxx-------] Yaniv Fais (Freescale)
> >  t[xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] John Havlicek 
> (Freescale - Chair)
> >  v[xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxrxxxxxxxxxxxxx-xxx] Dmitry Korchemny 
> (Intel - Co-Chair)
> >  v[xxxx-xxx-x--xx--xxxxx----------xx-xxxx] Manisha 
> Kulshrestha (Mentor Graphics)
> >  n[-------------------xxxxx-------x-xx-x-] Jiang Long 
> (Mentor Graphics)
> >  n[-----------x--xxx.....................] Joseph Lu (Altera)
> >  v[xxxxxxxx..............................] Johan Martensson (Jasper)
> >  n[----------------x--x-xx--xx-xxxxxxx-x-] Hillel Miller (Freescale)
> >  v[xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxx] Lisa Piper (Cadence)
> >  v[xx-xxxxxxx-x-xxxxx-x..................] Erik Seligman (Intel)
> >  n[---x--------xxxx-----xxxx-xx----------] Tej Singh 
> (Mentor Graphics)
> >  v[xxxx--xxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Bassam Tabbara (Synopsys)
> >  v[xxxxxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxxx...............] Tom Thatcher 
> (Sun Microsystems)
> >    |------------------------------------- attendance on 2007-10-16
> >  |--------------------------------------- voting 
> eligibility for this ballot
> > |---------------------------------------- email ballots received
> > 
> > 	Legend:
> > 		x = attended
> > 		- = missed
> > 		r = represented
> > 		. = not yet a member
> > 		v = valid voter (2 out of last 3 or 3/4 overall)
> > 		n = not valid voter
> >                 t = chair eligible to vote only to make or 
> break a tie
> > 
> 
> -- 
> ------------------
> Thomas J. Thatcher
> Sun Microsystems
> ------------------
> 
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
> 
> 

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Mon Oct 22 10:50:07 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Oct 22 2007 - 10:50:16 PDT