Hi Tom, there is a resolved mantis item 1543 that corrects it. Hopefully it did not miss the one you found. ed > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On > Behalf Of Thomas Thatcher > Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 12:48 PM > To: john.havlicek@freescale.com > Cc: sv-ac@eda.org; Neil Korpusik > Subject: Re: [sv-ac] 22.10 bind review > > Hi John, > > I reviewed clause 22.10, and verified that it was copied correctly. > However I did find one thing. > > 1. "-- It allows a convenient mechanism to attach verification > Internet Protocol (IP) to a module. . ." > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > Shouldn't this be "Intellectual Property"? This is in > both Draft 1 and > Draft 3. We've go a problem with duplicate meanings for > an acronym! > > Tom > > Lisa Piper wrote On 05/31/07 15:28,: > > Hi John, > > > > I confirmed that the 22.10 Text on Bind was copied from > Draft1 to Draft3 > > correctly. However, I also happened to notice that the Clause 16 > > description in section 1.6 (page 26) needs to be updated to exclude > > assertion binding. It should probably be added to the Clause 22 > > description as well. > > > > Another think that stands out now is that the title > "Binding properties > > to scopes or instances" is not generic enough. Bind was > moved because > > it does not have to only be used for assertions. > > > > Also, I noticed that Syntax 22-3 - Module item syntax replicates the > > bind directive from Annex A. Mantis 1722 added a note to > the annex A > > bind syntax but did not note that this reference also needs to be > > udpated. The other changes of 1722 are not yet > incorporated either. > > Perhaps we should open another Mantis item to change the > title and not > > the note for Syntx 22-3. > > > > Lisa > > > > > > -- > > This message has been scanned for viruses and > > dangerous content by *MailScanner* > <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is > > believed to be clean. > > -- > ------------------ > Thomas J. Thatcher > Sun Microsystems > 408-616-5589 > ------------------ > > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > > > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Tue Jun 5 10:16:33 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jun 05 2007 - 10:16:43 PDT