Re: [sv-ac] 22.10 bind review

Hi John,

I reviewed clause 22.10, and verified that it was copied correctly.
However I did find one thing.

1.  "-- It allows a convenient mechanism to attach verification
	Internet Protocol (IP) to a module. . ."
	^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    Shouldn't this be "Intellectual Property"?  This is in both Draft 1 and
    Draft 3.  We've go a problem with duplicate meanings for an acronym!

Tom

Lisa Piper wrote On 05/31/07 15:28,:
> Hi John,
> 
> I confirmed that the 22.10 Text on Bind was copied from Draft1 to Draft3
> correctly.  However, I also happened to notice that the Clause 16
> description in section 1.6 (page 26) needs to be updated to exclude
> assertion binding.  It should probably be added to the Clause 22
> description as well. 
> 
> Another think that stands out now is that the title “Binding properties
> to scopes or instances” is not generic enough.  Bind was moved because
> it does not  have to only be used for assertions.
> 
> Also, I noticed that Syntax 22-3 – Module item syntax replicates the
> bind directive from Annex A.  Mantis 1722 added a note to the annex A
> bind syntax but did not note that this reference also needs to be
> udpated.   The other changes of 1722 are not yet incorporated either.   
> Perhaps we should open another Mantis item to change the title and not
> the note for Syntx 22-3.
> 
> Lisa
> 
> 
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> believed to be clean.

-- 
------------------
Thomas J. Thatcher
Sun Microsystems
408-616-5589
------------------


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.