[sv-ac] RE: review for 1681

Hi Doron,

Thank you for the comments. I will look into it.

ed
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Doron Bustan [mailto:dbustan@freescale.com] 
> Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 4:32 PM
> To: Eduard Cerny; sv-ac@eda.org
> Subject: review for 1681
> 
> Hi Ed,
> 
> the review is below. I talked to one of the persons in sv-ec 
> and he said 
> that they would like to see it as well.
> I am not sure which group should vote on it, but we should at 
> least give 
> them an option to
> make comments.
> 
> Review for 1681
> ===================
> 
> 1. First paragraph - "global clocking" should be in red.
> 
> 2. page 2 - "One clocking can be specified as the global clocking for
>    the design." I looked at the lrm index and could not find "design",
>    we need a definition of the scope of the clock.
> 
> 3. page 2 -
> 
>     "In case when the global clocking has been specified in 
> the design 
> (see Note to editor: Insert a reference to
>      Global clocking subclause), for correct operation the 
> user should 
> make sure that the ticks of all other clocks
>      are aligned with the ticks of the global clock. The 
> simulation tool 
> may issue an error message when it detects
>      that this requirement has been violated."
> 
>      Need more details on what does "aligned with ticks of the global 
> clock" means?
> 
> 4. page 4 item b seems redundant.
> 
> 5. page 6 last line of a7 is too long. I think that the "Note" was 
> planed to have its own line.
>     I would not put the next value functions in yet.
> 
> 6. page 7, last line - global clocking should be in red.
> 
> 7. this is just a thought, but would it be useful to have an optional 
> switch in the global clock
>    declaration that defines it as the or of all the clocking event of 
> the design?
> 
> regards
> 
> Doron
> 
> 
> 

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.