Hi Ed, the review is below. I talked to one of the persons in sv-ec and he said that they would like to see it as well. I am not sure which group should vote on it, but we should at least give them an option to make comments. Review for 1681 =================== 1. First paragraph - "global clocking" should be in red. 2. page 2 - "One clocking can be specified as the global clocking for the design." I looked at the lrm index and could not find "design", we need a definition of the scope of the clock. 3. page 2 - "In case when the global clocking has been specified in the design (see Note to editor: Insert a reference to Global clocking subclause), for correct operation the user should make sure that the ticks of all other clocks are aligned with the ticks of the global clock. The simulation tool may issue an error message when it detects that this requirement has been violated." Need more details on what does "aligned with ticks of the global clock" means? 4. page 4 item b seems redundant. 5. page 6 last line of a7 is too long. I think that the "Note" was planed to have its own line. I would not put the next value functions in yet. 6. page 7, last line - global clocking should be in red. 7. this is just a thought, but would it be useful to have an optional switch in the global clock declaration that defines it as the or of all the clocking event of the design? regards Doron -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Mon Feb 26 13:32:39 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Feb 26 2007 - 13:33:08 PST