[sv-ac] review for 1681

From: Doron Bustan <dbustan_at_.....>
Date: Mon Feb 26 2007 - 13:32:13 PST
Hi Ed,

the review is below. I talked to one of the persons in sv-ec and he said 
that they would like to see it as well.
I am not sure which group should vote on it, but we should at least give 
them an option to
make comments.

Review for 1681
===================

1. First paragraph - "global clocking" should be in red.

2. page 2 - "One clocking can be specified as the global clocking for
   the design." I looked at the lrm index and could not find "design",
   we need a definition of the scope of the clock.

3. page 2 -

    "In case when the global clocking has been specified in the design 
(see Note to editor: Insert a reference to
     Global clocking subclause), for correct operation the user should 
make sure that the ticks of all other clocks
     are aligned with the ticks of the global clock. The simulation tool 
may issue an error message when it detects
     that this requirement has been violated."

     Need more details on what does "aligned with ticks of the global 
clock" means?

4. page 4 item b seems redundant.

5. page 6 last line of a7 is too long. I think that the "Note" was 
planed to have its own line.
    I would not put the next value functions in yet.

6. page 7, last line - global clocking should be in red.

7. this is just a thought, but would it be useful to have an optional 
switch in the global clock
   declaration that defines it as the or of all the clocking event of 
the design?

regards

Doron



-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Mon Feb 26 13:32:39 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Feb 26 2007 - 13:33:08 PST