All: I vote "yes" on 1495 (Ed's mail already shows it accepted, so the voting may be closed). I want to comment that we may want to relax this condition later. We had some discussion within Freescale about this, but we are not ready to enter any proposal. The idea behind 1495 is that the local variable flow rules apply to statically determined "locations", so if you dynamically select an lvalue, e.g., the flow rules don't work. However, there may be situations in which you want to have the components of an aggregate local variable filled in by separate threads of the assertion evaluation. Hopefully nothing in 1495 will preclude this relaxation later. Best regards, John H.Received on Fri Aug 18 10:33:09 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Aug 18 2006 - 10:33:15 PDT