RE: [sv-ac] 1495

From: Eduard Cerny <Eduard.Cerny_at_.....>
Date: Fri Aug 18 2006 - 11:23:01 PDT
John,

but that is still possible provided the selection is by constants. Would
variable selection be required? Let's first see if such a thing is
needed.

Best regards,
ed
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On 
> Behalf Of John Havlicek
> Sent: Friday, August 18, 2006 1:33 PM
> To: sv-ac@eda-stds.org
> Subject: [sv-ac] 1495
> 
> All:
> 
> I vote "yes" on 1495 (Ed's mail already shows it accepted,
> so the voting may be closed).
> 
> I want to comment that we may want to relax this condition
> later.  We had some discussion within Freescale about this,
> but we are not ready to enter any proposal.
> 
> The idea behind 1495 is that the local variable flow rules 
> apply to statically determined "locations", so if you dynamically
> select an lvalue, e.g., the flow rules don't work.
> 
> However, there may be situations in which you want to have
> the components of an aggregate local variable filled in by
> separate threads of the assertion evaluation.  
> 
> Hopefully nothing in 1495 will preclude this relaxation later.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> John H.
> 
Received on Fri Aug 18 11:23:08 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Aug 18 2006 - 11:23:23 PDT