Ok, I upload another file with the modified proposal (attached) Thanks Doron Brad Pierce wrote: >Yes, that's the idea. In my opinion, the whole sublanguage of >constant_this and constant_that could be profitably excised from the >BNF, so it would be great if we could resist adding to it. > >Consider that "const_variable_lvalue" would probably need to change >every one of its "variable_lvalue" ocurrences to >"const_variable_lvalue", not just the first one, and also use a new >nonterminal "const_assignment_pattern_variable_lvalue". > >I would suggest adding a footnote to variable_lvalue, perhaps > > "In a variable_lvalue that is assigned within a sequence_match_item >any select shall also be a constant_select." > > -- Brad > >-----Original Message----- >From: Doron Bustan [mailto:dbustan@freescale.com] >Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 11:11 AM >To: Brad Pierce >Cc: sv-ac@eda-stds.org >Subject: Re: [sv-ac] 1495 > >Do you mean by writing something like : > >"In assignments to local variables, the bit select on >the left hand side (if exists) has to be a constant" > >or, something else? > >Thanks > >Doron > >Brad Pierce wrote: > > > >>Why couldn't this be handled by a footnote or text? This is a semantic >>issue, not a syntactic issue. >> >>-- Brad >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: owner-sv-ac@eda-stds.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda-stds.org] On >>Behalf Of Doron Bustan >>Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 8:57 AM >>To: sv-ac@eda-stds.org >>Subject: [sv-ac] 1495 >> >>All >> >>I upload a proposal for 1495 (also attached) >> >>Doron >> >> >> >> >> > > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jul 26 2006 - 14:54:34 PDT