Re: Aug 10 Meeting 54 Minutes Posted

Hi all,
I'm asking this question out of total ignorance, so apologies in advance...
Does the IEEE specification cover interaction between e and other languages
(such as SystemC or SystemVerilog)? Or is that topic meant to be
vendor-specific?
Thanks,

JL

On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Brett Lammers <brettl@cadence.com> wrote:

>  Hello All
>     Small correction to the earlier email.
>
> The link to the online roster was incorrect and took you to a previous
> version of the roster. The correct link is *(
> http://www.eda-twiki.org/cgi-bin/viewfile.cgi/P1647/WebHome?rev=6;filename=ieee1647_online_roster.xls
> )*
>
> I have also updated the link appropriately in the meeting minutes
>
> Sorry for the misguidance.
>
> Thanks
>
> Brett Lammers
>
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* owner-ieee1647@eda.org [mailto:owner-ieee1647@eda.org] *On Behalf
> Of *Brett Lammers
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 12, 2009 10:14 AM
> *To:* ieee1647@eda.org
> *Subject:* Aug 10 Meeting 54 Minutes Posted
>
>  The minutes of meeting 54 of the IEEE 1647 e Language Working Group are
> posted on the website (
> http://www.eda-twiki.org/cgi-bin/view.cgi/P1647/MeetingFiftyFour<http://www.eda-twiki.org/cgi-bin/view.cgi/P1647/MeetingFiftyFour>
> ). Please review these for accuracy and forward any corrections or
> additions to me (brettl@cadence.com).
>
> Also, please review the attendance record (
> *
> http://www.eda-twiki.org/cgi-bin/viewfile.cgi/P1647/WebHome?rev=4;filename=ieee1647_online_roster.xls
> *<http://www.eda-twiki.org/cgi-bin/viewfile.cgi/P1647/WebHome?rev=4;filename=ieee1647_online_roster.xls>)
> for this meeting to verify that your attendance was recorded. If not, mail a
> message to ieee1647@eda.org containing rollcall in the subject line.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Brett Lammers
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> believed to be clean.
>

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.