David,
Thanks for your review. You are right, we are only dealing with the technical content. The material at the beginning is inserted as part of the copyediting done by IEEE. There will be a review of that material before it gets published.
Regarding the unit of the two densities, these did not have a unit in the first version of the standard. The form I proposed follows that used in package fundamental_constants for PHYS_GRAVITY. Since the information is in a comment it didn't seem as important to make it fully compliant with SI as if it had been part of a declaration. Compliance isn't possible in all cases anyway, for example if the unit uses Greek letters. I agree with you that this should be good enough for now, we can handle changes we deem necessary as part of the integration into 1076.1.
Ernst
--
Ernst Christen, christen.1858@verizon.net on 4/27/2010
> Hi Ernst,
>
> Feedback is a bit late…
>
> I assume the first 8 pages in the released standard, that are
> missing in the document you pointed to, are provided by the IEEE. This includes
> the abstract on the title page, the Introduction, Participants (some other
> information is there but it is not specific to this standard). When does this
> information get updated and reviewed? My assumption is that this is separate
> from the technical content and we are just approving the technical content.
>
>
>
> The comments added for Density of polysilicon and silicon-dioxide
> have units <KILOGRAMS/METER_CUBED>. The actual SI derived unit name for
> density, in SI10-2002, is kilogram per cubic meter (the name) and kg/m3
> (for the unit). This is semantically consistent but syntactically different. I
> guess my question is how much do we actually follow the SI standard on unit
> names? Since we are doing another pass through this on integrating it into the
> 1076.1 LRM I think this is fine for now. We may need to reconcile all the units
> when we integrate.
>
>
>
> Other than that I see no issues.
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> David
>
>
>
> David W. Smith
>
> Synopsys Scientist
>
>
>
> Synopsys, Inc.
>
> Synopsys Technology Park
>
> 2025 NW Cornelius Pass Road
>
> Hillsboro, OR 97124
>
>
>
> Voice: 503.547.6467
>
> Main: 503.547.6000
>
> Cell: 503.560.5389
>
> FAX: 503.547.6906
>
> Email: david.smith@synopsys.com
>
>
>
>
> Saber Accelerates Robust Design
>
> Predictable. Repeatable. Reliable. Proven.
>
>
>
>
> From:
> Christen
> Sent: Friday, April 16, 2010 12:11 PM
> To: VHDL-AMS WG
> Subject: IEEE P1076.1 WG: Review of draft document for P1076.1.1
>
>
>
>
> All,
>
>
>
>
>
> As
> discussed at the Working Group meeting this past Tuesday, the draft of
> P1076.1.1-2010 VHDL Analog and Mixed-Signal Extensions—Packages for
> Multiple Energy Domain Support is available for review by the WG. This is a
> minor update to IEEE Std 1076.1.1-2004. Changes are indicated by markup in the
> document. The review will end on April 23, 2010 and be followed by a vote of
> the WG to approve the document.
>
>
>
>
>
> The
> To access the document you need an account on the Working Group twiki site.
> Please contact the WG Secretary Alain Vachoux, alain.vachoux@epfl.ch to get an
> account. Accounts are available for Working Group members who are also DASC
> members.
>
>
>
>
>
> Please
> send comments about the document content to the reflector. Please send
> questions and issues about access to the document to Alain and to me.
>
>
> Ernst Christen
> Chair, IEEE P1076.1 Working Group
> email: christen.1858@verizon.net
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by
MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
To unsubscribe to the vhdl-ams mailing list:
mailto:Majordomo@eda.org?subject=Unsubscribe&body=unsubscribe%20vhdl-ams
Received on Tue Apr 27 20:39:25 2010