[vhdl-200x-ft] Reposted: FT22, static aggregates and composite expression

From: Jim Lewis <jim_at_.....>
Date: Thu Mar 31 2005 - 14:41:49 PST
Hi,
I just reposted FT22.  Somehow the version on the
eda.org website was not the most current one.

Also note that I removed the post date for the proposals
page as they were hopelessly out of date.  If you want
to check the post date of a proposal, do a directory listing
of the proposals page by referincing the following link:
   http://www.eda-twiki.org/vhdl-200x/vhdl-200x-ft/proposals/

Cheers,
Jim

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: FW: [vhdl-200x-ft] FT22, static aggregates and composite expression has been updated
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 17:43:09 +0930
From: Peter Ashenden <peter@ashenden.com.au>
Organization: Ashenden Designs
To: 'Jim Lewis' <Jim@SynthWorks.com>

Jim,

Could you please update the FT proposals page with the updated version that
John posted to the email list a couple of weeks back?  I thougbt I was going
mad looking at the version on the website until I remembered he'd fwded the
revision by email only.  Many thanks.

Cheers,

PA

--
Dr. Peter J. Ashenden                        peter@ashenden.com.au
Ashenden Designs Pty. Ltd.                   www.ashenden.com.au
PO Box 640                                   Ph:  +61 8 8339 7532
Stirling, SA 5152                            Fax: +61 8 8339 2616
Australia                                    Mobile: +61 414 70 9106


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-vhdl-200x-ft@eda.org [mailto:owner-vhdl-200x-ft@eda.org] On
Behalf Of John Ries
Sent: Tuesday, 15 March 2005 02:27
To: Peter Ashenden
Cc: vhdl-200x-ft@eda.org
Subject: Re: [vhdl-200x-ft] FT22, static aggregates and composite expression
has been updated


Peter has pointed out that the new FT-22 was missing a discussion on the
definition of locally static subtypes.  I've added this into the proposal
and have reposted it.

Regards,
    John

Peter Ashenden wrote:
> John,
> 
> Your new version of the proposal has removed the proposed changes to 
> item
> (b) and to the rules for locally static array subtypes.  Is there are
> reason?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> PA
> 
> --
> Dr. Peter J. Ashenden                        peter@ashenden.com.au
> Ashenden Designs Pty. Ltd.                   www.ashenden.com.au
> PO Box 640                                   Ph:  +61 8 8339 7532
> Stirling, SA 5152                            Fax: +61 8 8339 2616
> Australia                                    Mobile: +61 414 70 9106
> 
> 
> 
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: owner-vhdl-200x-ft@eda.org
>>[mailto:owner-vhdl-200x-ft@eda.org] On Behalf Of John Ries
>>Sent: Saturday, 12 March 2005 04:51
>>To: vhdl-200x-ft@eda.org
>>Subject: [vhdl-200x-ft] FT22, static aggregates and composite 
>>expression has been updated
>>
>>
>>FT22 has been updated to reflect the use of aggregates as
>>choices for case statements and how the effect the value of 
>>the aggregate.
>>-- 
>>-- mailto: johnr@model.com     phone: (503)685-0864
>>--   http://www.model.com        fax: (503)685-0921
>>--
>>
>>
> 
> 


-- 
-- mailto: johnr@model.com     phone: (503)685-0864
--   http://www.model.com        fax: (503)685-0921
--




-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jim Lewis
Director of Training             mailto:Jim@SynthWorks.com
SynthWorks Design Inc.           http://www.SynthWorks.com
1-503-590-4787

Expert VHDL Training for Hardware Design and Verification
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Received on Thu Mar 31 14:41:52 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Mar 31 2005 - 14:42:16 PST