If there's no reason to make it restrictive to a literal, then primary is more general and powerful. -Steve Bailey > The size of decimal literals has been updated in the proposal > to reflect Peter's mail. > > As for making the size a literal instead of a primary, I > don't have any problems with that. I just thought it would > be neat to be able to dynamically size literals but I didn't > have any real problem in mind when I made the size a primary. > > Regards, > John > > Peter Ashenden wrote: > > Folks, > > > > I'm just going through FT09, bit-string literals. I discussed this > > with John R last November and summarized our conclusions in > an email > > on the > > reflector: > > > > http://www.eda-twiki.org/vhdl-200x/vhdl-200x-ft/hm/0311.html > > > > I didn't get any responses. Do I take that as tacit > approval? If so, > > we need to update the proposal doc before it goes to WG vote. > > > > Cheers, > > > > PA > > -- > > Dr. Peter J. Ashenden peter@ashenden.com.au > > Ashenden Designs Pty. Ltd. www.ashenden.com.au > > PO Box 640 Ph: +61 8 8339 7532 > > Stirling, SA 5152 Fax: +61 8 8339 2616 > > Australia Mobile: +61 414 70 9106 > > > > > -- > -- mailto: johnr@model.com phone: (503)685-0864 > -- http://www.model.com fax: (503)685-0921 > -- > >Received on Wed Mar 16 13:59:44 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Mar 16 2005 - 14:00:07 PST