The size of decimal literals has been updated in the proposal to reflect Peter's mail. As for making the size a literal instead of a primary, I don't have any problems with that. I just thought it would be neat to be able to dynamically size literals but I didn't have any real problem in mind when I made the size a primary. Regards, John Peter Ashenden wrote: > Folks, > > I'm just going through FT09, bit-string literals. I discussed this with > John R last November and summarized our conclusions in an email on the > reflector: > > http://www.eda-twiki.org/vhdl-200x/vhdl-200x-ft/hm/0311.html > > I didn't get any responses. Do I take that as tacit approval? If so, we > need to update the proposal doc before it goes to WG vote. > > Cheers, > > PA > -- > Dr. Peter J. Ashenden peter@ashenden.com.au > Ashenden Designs Pty. Ltd. www.ashenden.com.au > PO Box 640 Ph: +61 8 8339 7532 > Stirling, SA 5152 Fax: +61 8 8339 2616 > Australia Mobile: +61 414 70 9106 > -- -- mailto: johnr@model.com phone: (503)685-0864 -- http://www.model.com fax: (503)685-0921 --Received on Wed Mar 16 07:55:26 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Mar 16 2005 - 07:55:38 PST