RE: [vhdl-200x-ft] Revised FT13: stop and finish operations

From: Peter Ashenden <peter@ashenden.com.au>
Date: Mon Dec 20 2004 - 19:35:10 PST

Tristan,

I'm happy for the ENV package to be in library STD rather than IEEE.

The VHPI draft is now available for review by WG members. Please contact
Steve Bailey for access details (see attached). It describes the semantics
of stop, finish and reset in terms of the simulation cycle. However, the
semantics of the proposed STOP and FINISH procedures in ENV would be
slightly different, since they can only be called during the process
execution step of the initialization phase or simulation cycle.

Cheers,

PA

--
Dr. Peter J. Ashenden                        peter@ashenden.com.au
Ashenden Designs Pty. Ltd.                   www.ashenden.com.au
PO Box 640                                   Ph:  +61 8 8339 7532
Stirling, SA 5152                            Fax: +61 8 8339 2616
Australia                                    Mobile: +61 414 70 9106
> -----Original Message-----
> From: tgingold@free.fr [mailto:tgingold@free.fr] 
> Sent: Monday, 20 December 2004 23:34
> To: Peter Ashenden
> Cc: vhdl-200x-ft@eda.org
> Subject: Re: [vhdl-200x-ft] Revised FT13: stop and finish operations
> 
> 
> Selon Peter Ashenden <peter@ashenden.com.au>:
> 
> > Folks,
> >
> > I had an action from the last VHDL-200c-FT meeting to update FT13 - 
> > please see attached.  The revision embodies the consensus of the 
> > meeting to specify an environment package with STOP and FINISH 
> > procedures, rather than a binding to the vhpi_control 
> function defined 
> > by the VHPI.  Comments?
> Two comments:
> 
> the package should be part of the STD library and not of IEEE 
> library, since this feature belongs to the simulator.
> 
> I was not yet able to read the VHPI draft, but the semantic 
> of STOP/FINISH/RESET is not clear at all.  Maybe they should 
> be defined using the terminology of the current LRM.
> 
> Tristan.
> 

attached mail follows:


Hi Everyone,

Francoise and the VHPI team have completed the 2nd draft of the VHPI portion
of the LRM. They believe that it is ready for a broader review. If you
would like to review the VHPI, please contact Francoise and I
(sbailey@model.com) and we will provide instructions on accessing and how to
feedback comments.

Chuck Swart, can you find someone from the ISAC team that has not already
been involved in VHPI to review?

Thanks,

------------
Stephen Bailey
Product Marketing Manager, ModelSim
Mentor Graphics
sbailey@model.com
303-775-1655 (mobile, preferred)
720-494-1202 (office)
 <file://www.model.com> www.model.com
Received on Mon Dec 20 19:35:00 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Dec 20 2004 - 19:35:01 PST