> I don’t see how we can avoid a means of associating a type with one > or more interfaces. Interfaces don’t get associated to just other > interfaces, they get associated with signal, constant and variable > (for subprograms) objects. And those objects have types. I strongly agree with this requirement. The 'interface' could also be used to declare objects (but as I said this has important consequences). > Compatibility with subprograms (sequentially or concurrently called) > is also desirable. 'Desirable' is the right word IMHO; this is not a requirement. Tristan. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Thu Mar 5 00:29:16 2015
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Mar 05 2015 - 00:29:19 PST