On 10/01/15 07:46, Daniel Kho wrote: > This is one of the reasons I am supporting the proposal for extended or > arbitrary-length integers: > http://www.eda-twiki.org/cgi-bin/view.cgi/P1076/ArbitraryIntegers I still think this proposal is not clear enough. If infinite precision integers (at simulation time) are proposed, that's awful from a performance point of view. I repeat: I am ok with infinite precision at analysis time, and not against any but fixed precision at simulation time; but certainly not ok with infinite precision at simulation time. All integer types must have bounds. Tristan. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Fri Jan 9 23:13:54 2015
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jan 09 2015 - 23:14:04 PST