Re: [vhdl-200x] A compromise about modular type, boolean operations, integers...

From: <>
Date: Thu Oct 23 2014 - 10:01:41 PDT
> So would the syntax for part B be something like:
> subtype integer4 is integer range 0 to 3
> subtype modular4 is integer modular 0 to 3
> Where integer4 would trap on overflow and modular4 would wrap?

This notation doesn't make sense.  A subtype declaration does not
declare a type and therefore does not declare operations.  So
the operator for integer4 or modular4 are the operators of integer.


This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Thu Oct 23 10:01:57 2014

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Oct 23 2014 - 10:02:34 PDT