Re: [vhdl-200x] A compromise about modular type, boolean operations, integers...

> So would the syntax for part B be something like:
> 
> subtype integer4 is integer range 0 to 3
> subtype modular4 is integer modular 0 to 3
> 
> Where integer4 would trap on overflow and modular4 would wrap?

This notation doesn't make sense.  A subtype declaration does not
declare a type and therefore does not declare operations.  So
the operator for integer4 or modular4 are the operators of integer.

Tristan.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.