RE: [vhdl-200x] Meeting Reminder: Thursday Feb 17, 8 am Pacific

Hello Hans,

<snip>
>> * Clarification on additional language interfaces, specifically:
>> * In what way is VHPI inadequate for this purpose?
>> * Shouldn't we rather improve VHPI than create new interfaces?
>
>I agree with you but I think the problem most of us have is that we
don't
>have access to the VHPI. As far as I know only 1 EDA vendor supports
it.

I'm not convinced that creating a new interface will solve that problem
- if anything it seems more likely to create greater impediment to tool
vendor support!

Thanks,

Chris

Please consider the environment before printing this email.

This message should be regarded as confidential. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender and destroy it immediately.
Statements of intent shall only become binding when confirmed in hard copy by an authorised signatory. The contents of this email may relate to dealings with other companies within the Detica Limited group of companies.

Detica Limited is registered in England under No: 1337451.

Registered offices: Surrey Research Park, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7YP, England.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.