Re: [sv-champions] Email vote ending August 1, 2011

Hi Dave,

Mantis item 2463 has taken a very unusual sequence of steps.

I have reviewed all of the notes in this mantis item and was then able to
go back and find the email trail where Brad, Shalom, Myself and Stu agreed
that it was an editorial change that Stu would go ahead and make.

I have updated the mantis item with an explanation and then moved it to
the closed state. Editorial changes don't need to be approved by either the
Champions or the Working Group.

I didn't notice all of this back when I sent it to the Champions for an
email vote.

Neil

On 08/05/11 11:24, Rich, Dave wrote:
> Neil,
>
> During the SV-BC meeting, we discussed the fact that mantis 2463 should not have been sent back to them. Instead the champions could have just dealt with it as an action item for the chairs to handle.
>
> I think there is a general problem with the champions not meeting to discuss some of the issues that they would like to send to the technical committees; It creates an unnecessary burden on them by creating an extra discussion and voting cycle. If the champions met, we could discuss the issues that failed and perhaps send them forward with editorial issues as action items.
>
> Dave
>
>

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.