Re: [sv-champions] Agenda for July 24th meeting

Hi Brad,

The abstains were on an email vote. Those that didn't
participate in the email vote, but were eligible voters,
were recorded as an abstain. No reasons were given
by those that didn't participate.

Neil




Brad Pierce wrote:
> Neil,
> 
> What were the reasons for the three abstains?
> 
> -- Brad
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-champions@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-champions@eda.org] On
> Behalf Of Neil Korpusik
> Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2008 9:27 AM
> To: sv-champions@eda.org
> Subject: [sv-champions] Agenda for July 24th meeting
> 
> Hi Champions,
> 
> The agenda for our next meeting is shown below.
> There are 3 mantis items for review, one of which is a duplicate.
> 
> Neil
> 
> 
> 
> 
>                 Toll Free Dial In Number: (866)839-8145
> Int'l Access/Caller Paid Dial In Number: (215)446-3660
>                              ACCESS CODE: 9301228
> 
> 
> List of Mantis items for the next Champions meeting.
> July 24, 2008. 8-10am PDT.
> 
> 
> 1.  2370  SV-SC  Inferred clock ambiguities with the sampled functions
>                   - Champions feedback on 1698
>      - duplicate
>      - This mantis item was opened at the request of the Champions
>        The Champions flagged the following:
>        "There seems to be something missing on how putting $past into
>         the procedural code is meant to work."
>      - The sv-sc reviewed 1698 and determined that no changes are
> required.
> 
> 2.  2415  SV-SC  Allow using .triggered methods in sequences
>      - fixed
>      - Passed in SV-SC vote closing 2008-07-16, 10y/0n/3a.
> 
> 3.  1728  SV-SC  Introduce "let"statement
>      - fixed
>      - Started out in the sv-ac
>      - Was sent back to the svac in the Champions conference call of Nov
> 8th.
>      - The champions feedback was addressed
>      - The proposal failed in the Champions email vote which ended
>        on Feb 4th, 2008.
>      - The proposal was approved by the Champions in the
>        February 25th, 2008 conference call with 2 opposed. (Dave, Stu)
>      - The Working Group unanimously agreed to send this Mantis item to
> the new
>        Assertions sub-committee in the conference call of March 27,
> 2008.
>      - Passed in SV-SC vote closing 2008-07-16: 10y/0n/3a
> 
> 

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.