-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. Champions July 10, 2008 Conference call Thursday 8-10am PDT Attendees: ---------- 1. - Stu Sutherland 2. - Surrendra Dudani 3. * Brad Pierce 4. * Francoise Martinolle 5. * Shalom Bresticker 6. * John Havlicek 7. * Dave Rich 8. * Neil Korpusik 1. Review IEEE patent policy ref: http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-slideset.ppt Dave, Brad - assume the patent policy was read. 2. List of Mantis items for review 2.1 2431 SV-AC Addressing editor issue regarding \equiv operator definition - Fixed - Unanimously approved by sv-ac by voice vote 2008-06-30: 5y/0n/0a Move: Brad - approve the proposal for Mantis item 2431 Second: John Passed unanimously 2.2 2173 SV-AC Add case construct for properties. - Fixed - Unanimously approved by the SV-AC 2008-03-20: Voice vote 5y/0n/0a - Champions sent it to sv-bc for review - SV-BC provided feedback - It was updated with SV-BC feedback and aligned to draft 6 Re-approved by the sv-ac by voice vote 2008-06-30: 5y/0n/0a - June 30, Dmitry sent email to sv-bc notifying them of the change - July 07, sv-bc approves the change but notes an invalid usage of a keyword An example uses 'wait' as though it isn't a keyword. - Dmitry plans to address this in the sv-ac meeting of July 14 Move: Brad - Approve the proposal for Mantis item 2173 with a friendly amendment to change 'wait' to 'delay' in the example Second: Dave - It needs to also be updated on mantis before going to the working group Passed unanimously John - also noticed some minor mistakes in the fonts Neil - the Editor already has to reformat when moving to Framemaker 2.3 2326 SV-AC add VPI diagrams for property case - Fixed - Unanimously approved by the sv-ac 2008-03-20: Voice vote 5y/0n/0a - The SV-CC reviewed this on 04/09/2008 and PASSED it (unanimous). - The proposal was deferred by the Champions in the April 24th, 2008 conference call until 0002173 is completed. - aligned with Draft6. Approved by voice vote 2008-06-30: 5y/0n/0a John - how does vpi allow checking if a case_item is the default? - he expected a note about this Brad - in 33.63 it mentions that the default returns null John - this one should be similar to the procedural case. Shalom - page 2, the blue is in the upper part (from draft 6) Brad - the colorized version is from draft 6 Shalom - the to part appears to be wrong (bool: vpiOpstrong) Brad - it isn't blue - not intended to be changed. - not sure how to fix AI/Brad - change the "to" part in the proposal AI/Neil - notify the sv-ac of this Move: Brad - approve the proposal for Mantis item 2326 the amended proposal. Second: John Passed unanimously 2.4 2327 SV-AC 2173 adds property case, need to add vacuity definition and multi clocking behavior in it - Fixed - SV-AC unanimously approved 2008-03-20: Voice vote 5y/0n/0aS - The proposal was deferred by the Champions in the April 24th, 2008 conference call until 0002173 is completed. - aligned to Draft6 was approved by voice vote 2008-06-30: 5y/0n/0a Shalom - non-vacuous is missing a '-' in the blue text John - "attempts" - this term is used when there are multiple evaluations possible - evaluation and evaluation attempts are not really different Dave - attempt - creates a thread evaluation is the evaluation AI/Neil - add a note to the editor for the hyphenation problem. Dave - attempt vs evaluation should be cleaned up in the next PAR. John - the other items in this same list all say "evaluation attempt" Shalom - others items in the list also seem to have the same problem as this mantis Move: Shalom - send the proposal for Mantis item 2327 back to sv-ac. Look at ad) ab) and ac). All should be checked. Second: Dave Passed unanimously 2.5 742 SV-CC Need VPI info on parameters that are types - Fixed - On 06/04/2008 the SV-CC PASSED this proposal (unanimous). FM - dashed bubbles - that means a new class being added Shalom - see page 7 - parameters contains two items - what about compilation scope? FM - the parameters with the 's' should allow this Shalom - how do you get there? FM - there are other diagrams that show the vpi parameter relationship Shalom - 36.9 has more to it than shown in the proposal that addresses it - on page 7, why is only module shown here? why not program and interface as well? - the same section, page 8, has interface and program added to it why not same thing for module at the top of page 7? AI/Neil - parameter is now 36.25 (not 36.24) - dependency on 2094 (which was approved in this meeting) Note: "36.26 Class typespec" is added by 2094 and then updated in 742 Move: FM - send the proposal for Mantis item 742 to svcc to address Shalaom's concern with the first diagram at the top of page 7 (as compared to the diagram on page 8). Second: Brad Passed unanimously 2.6 1076 SV-BC Misuse of term reg in 17.2.4.4 (1364) - No change required - On June 23, 2008 the SV-BC unanimously approved resolving this issue with no further action as it was addressed during the merge of the 1364 and 1800 LRMs. Move: Brad - approve the resolution of "no change required" for Mantis item 1076 Second: Shalom Passed unanimously 2.7 2127 SV-BC Clarify event scheduling of sequential UDPs - Duplicate - On June 23, 2008 the SV-BC unanimously approved resolution of this issue with no further action as it is a duplicate of 0001062. Move: Brad - approve the resolution of duplicate for Mantis item 2127 Second: Shalom Passed unanimously 2.8 2360 SV-BC Missing Initialization Vector spec for Encryption breaks portability for all CBC algorithms - Fixed - On June 9, 2008 the SV-BC unanimously approved the proposal with the friendly amendments noted here on the SV-BC reflector: http://www.eda-twiki.org/sv-bc/hm/8738.html [^] This feedback is also captured in Shalom's bug note (0007007) dated June 7, 2008. Brad - has uploaded a new version that contains the friendly amendment - is it now also draft 6 Move: Brad - approve the proposal for Mantis item 2360 Second: Shalom Passed unanimously 2.9 2054 SV-CC Draft 3a, Section 40 - Deprecate Data Read API - Fixed - The SV-CC PASSED this on 03/26/2008 3 opposed: Michael, Francoise, Ghassan 1 abstain: Bassam 6 in favor: Abi, John, Chuck, Jim, Steve, Anil - The proposal was approved by the Champions in the April 10th, 2008 conference call with friendly amendments. There was one abstain. (Brad - doesn't know enough about it) - The proposal was updated. - On 05/21/2008 the SV-CC approved the latest proposal for this issue. (unanimous) FM - was concerned about removing the data read API. Move: FM - approve the proposal for Mantis item 2054 Second: John Abstain: Shalom - Removes an essential capability to transfer simulation data between tools. There isn't a replacement for it. Brad - Agrees with Shalom. Thinks it was a political decision. Technically it should be there. Passed (3 in favor and 2 abstains) Note: In the meeting I mentioned that I would check the Operating Guidelines to determine if it should be considered passed. According to the latest guidelines it does pass. 2.10 2094 SV-CC Need to extend VPI to handle class specializations - Fixed - The SV-CC PASSED this on 03/26/2008 (unanimous) - The proposal was unanimously approved by the Champions in the April 10th, 2008 conference call with friendly amendments. - On 05/21/2008 the SV-CC approved the latest proposal for this issue. (unanimous) FM - this proposal adds class typespec (see Mantis 742) Brad - noted that this one adds the section that was flagged as missing from the other other mantis item (Mantis 742) Shalom - numbering is off (see page 5) cross references AI/Neil - note to editor about adding this proposal before adding 742. AI/Neil - note to editor about cross reference (36.24 on page 5 isn't correct) Move: FM - approve the proposal for Mantis item 2094 Second: Brad Passed unanimously 3. Next meeting July 24 August 7Received on Tue Jul 15 16:56:24 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jul 15 2008 - 16:56:27 PDT