RE: [sv-champions] 14.9: "shall"?

In my opinion, deleting a normative word like this is more than an editorial
correction, and needs to be an approved change.

Stu
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Stuart Sutherland

Sutherland HDL, Inc.

stuart@sutherland-hdl.com

503-692-0898
www.sutherland-hdl.com

From: owner-sv-champions@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-champions@eda.org] On
Behalf Of Bresticker, Shalom
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2012 9:35 PM
To: stuart@sutherland-hdl.com
Cc: sv-xc@eda.org
Subject: [sv-champions] 14.9: "shall"?

Hi,

The last sentence of the first paragraph of 14.9 says,

"The interface's wires shall have the same direction as specified in the
clocking block when viewed from the testbench side (i.e., modport test) and
reversed when viewed from the DUT (i.e., modport dut)."

I don't think that "shall" is appropriate here. The sentence is not
describing a language requirement. I think the word should either be deleted
or replaced by "would", perhaps.

Thanks,

SHalom

Shalom Bresticker

Intel LAD DA, Jerusalem, Israel

+972 2 589 6582 (office)

+972 54 721 1033 (cell)

http://www.linkedin.com/in/shalombresticker

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and 
dangerous content by  <http://www.mailscanner.info/> MailScanner, and is 
believed to be clean. 
-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.