[P1800] Re: Should attendence be reset in the Technical Committees?

I suggest resetting the voting rights.

Karen




----- Original Message ----
From: Neil Korpusik <Neil.Korpusik@Sun.COM>
To: Karen Pieper <karen_l_pieper@yahoo.com>
Cc: "Rich, Dave" <Dave_Rich@mentor.com>; Charlie Dawson <chas@cadence.com>; IEEE P1800 Working Group <ieee1800@eda.org>
Sent: Wednesday, April 8, 2009 1:49:50 PM
Subject: Should attendence be reset in the Technical Committees?

Hi Karen,

In the last Working Group meeting we didn't discuss the topic
of resetting voting rights for the TCs. We have done this
at various points in the past. We now need to make a decision
on this so that all of the TCs are operating in a consistent
way.

Should we reset the voting rights in the TCs now that we are
beginning the balloting feedback stage? I don't feel strongly
either way on this but we do need to decide one way or the
other.


Neil




On 04/08/09 13:22, Rich, Dave wrote:
> FYI Chas, attendance rows should be reset with this meeting.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-cc@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-cc@server.eda.org] On
> Behalf Of Charlie Dawson
> Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 12:17 PM
> To: SV-CC
> Subject: [sv-cc] Un-Approved SV-CC Meeting minutes for Apr-08-2009
> 
> http://www.eda-twiki.org/cgi-bin/view.cgi/P1800/SVCCMeetingMinutes090408
> 
> Unapproved Minutes of Apr-08-2009 SV-CC Meeting.
> 
> ATTENDEES
> 
> 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
> 99988888888888888888887777777777777777777777777666666666
> 00011000000000000000001111100000000000000000000111110000
> 41100987765544333221112210099888876655443322111221009988
> 02120113102000211213101002121221012020212121310200212131
> 88428030641792692730629574062925180639518484173068517306
> xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx-xxx-xxxxxx-xxxxxxxxxxx Charles Dawson
> xxxxx-xxxxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx--xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Jim Vellenga
> xxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxxx Chuck Berking
> -xxx-x-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx-xxxxx-xx--xx-xxxxxxxxxxxxxx-xxxxx Bassam Tabbara
> xxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxxxx-xx-xx-x-xxxxxxx Francoise
> Martinolle
> -xx-x-xx-xxxxxx-xxxxx-xxxxxxxx---xxxxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxxx- Ghassan Khoory
> xxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx-----xxxxxxx-xxxxx-xxxxxxx Abigail
> Moorhouse
> xxxx-xxxxx-x-xxxxxxxxxx--------------------------------- John Shields
> xx---xxx*xx-xxx-xxxx-xxx-xxxx---xx--xxxxx-xxxx--xxxxxx-x Michael
> Rohleder
> ========================================================
> -xx----------------------------------------------------- Ying-Tsai Chang
> -----x---xxxx-xx-x-xxx--x-xxxxx--xxxx------------------- Anil Arora
> --------x---xx--x--------------------------------------- Erik Seligman
> -------------xx-xxxx-xxx-------------x-----xx----------- Steve Dovich
> x----------------x-xxx-xx-x------xxx-x--x--xxxx----xx-xx Amit Kohli
> ----------------------xx-x-xxxxx-xxxxxxxx-xxxxxxx-x-xxxx Ralph Duncan
> --------------------x--xx--xx-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx-xxx-x-xxx Andrzej
> Litwiniuk
> -------------------------x-xxxx--xxxx------------------- Pankaj Pal
> ---------------------------x-x----xx-------------------- Arjinder Vasir
> ----------------x-----------------------x--------------- Stu Sutherland
> --------------------------------------x----------------- Gord
> Vreugdenhil
> --------x--------------------x-------------------------- Neil Korpusik
> --------------------------x----------------------------- John Havlicek
> 
> 
> 1. Reviewed Patent information
> 
> - Chas reviewed the patent information which can be found at
> http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-slideset.ppt
> 
> 2. Approval of agenda
> Chuck/Francoise APPROVED
> 
> 3. Review minutes from last meeting (Jan-28-2009)
> 
>      JimV/Chuck.  ACCEPTED
> 
> 4. Liaisons
> 
>    - Chas commented on the P1800 meeting.
>      Draft passed 10-0.  There were 192 comments.  SV-CC got 31 unique
> ones.
>      Need to determine if we can be done by May 14th.
>      Need to respond to P1800 by next Thursday.
> 
>    - No other meetings to report on.
> 
> 5. Consent Agenda
> 
> 6. Expedited Agenda Items
> 
> 7. New business
> 
>      *
>        Discuss issues during balloting
> 
> We went through each ballot comment and assigned an owner.
> 
>    - 1775 Chuck - already has proposal
>    - 2427 Chas - looks easy
>    - 2572 Chuck - Passed by email.  chuck has an addendum from Shalom
>    - 2576 Jim - already has proposal
>    - 2582 Bassam
>    - 2588 Amit
>    - 2621 Jim - Might be complicated. Some discussion.
>    - 2622 Chuck - already fixed?
>    - 2623 Chas
>    - 2624 Chas
>    - 2625 Chas
>    - 2626 Chas
>    - 2627 Abi
>    - 2628 Chuck
>    - 2629 John
>    - 2630 Abi
>    - 2631 Chas
>    - 2632 Francoise
>    - 2633 Francoise
>    - 2634 Should go to SV-BC
>    - 2635 Amit
>    - 2636 Amit
>    - 2637 Chas
>    - 2638 Amit
>    - 2639 Amit
>    - 2640 Amit
>    - 2641 Amit
>    - 2642 Should go to SV-BC
>    - 2643 Should go to SV-BC
>    - 2644 Abi
>    - 2645 Amit
> 
> Is it possible to get the source from Stu?  Chas to ask him.
> 
> 
>      *
>        Discuss schedule - Can we complete ballot items before
> May-14-2009?
> 
> Everyone with assigned mantis items will get back to chas by weds if
> they think they
> will need more time.
> 
>      *
>        Next meeting
> 
> After some discussion we concluded that we should meet again in two
> weeks
> at our regularly scheduled time.
> 
> Motion to adjourn: Chuck/Michael. Meeting ended at 1:15 pm.
> 
> 8. Reviewed items with proposals
> 
> 9. Reviewed SV-CC items with proposals (Straw poll only)
> 
> 10. Old Business
> 
> 11. Action items
> 
> Assigned to     Due date     Description     State     Notify     
> ChasDawson     Tue, 29 Jul 2008     Enter Mantis Items for Krzysztof
> Konopko's questions (go to action)             edit
> JimVellenga     Wed, 29 Jul 2009     Enter Mantis Item for the
> reference to the data read API in a comment in the include file. (go to
> action)             edit
> 
> 12. Items for consideration at the next meeting (they already have
> proposals)
> 
> 13. Next meeting
> 
> The next SV-CC meeting will be on Apr-22-2009.
> 
> The next P1800 meeting will be on May-14-2009.
> 



      

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.