RE: [P1800] Proposed Responses to Out-of-scope Ballot Issues

Should be removed.

"The committee read and considered this feedback. While it has merit, the committee believes it is not feasible to implement at this time."

--
Matt Maidment
mmaidmen@ichips.intel.com

From: Neil.Korpusik@Sun.COM [mailto:Neil.Korpusik@Sun.COM]
Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 9:26 AM
To: Maidment, Matthew R
Cc: IEEE P1800 Working Group
Subject: Re: [P1800] Proposed Responses to Out-of-scope Ballot Issues

Hi Matt,

I just had one comment on the first proposed response.
The word either should be removed (shown in red).

Neil



On 04/02/09 09:18, Maidment, Matthew R wrote:
Proposed response to issue whose scope is too ambitious for current draft:

"The committee read and considered this feedback. While it has merit, the committee believes it is either not feasible to implement at this time."

Proposed response to issue whose scope is outside P1800:

"The committee read and considered this feedback.   The committee believes it is not in the scope or goals of the P1800 project as it was defined & agreed upon by the P1800 WG"




--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner<http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
believed to be clean.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.