Re: [P1800] Proposed Responses to Out-of-scope Ballot Issues

From: Neil Korpusik <Neil.Korpusik_at_.....>
Date: Thu Apr 02 2009 - 09:26:11 PDT
Hi Matt,

I just had one comment on the first proposed response.
The word either should be removed (shown in red).

Neil



On 04/02/09 09:18, Maidment, Matthew R wrote:
>
> Proposed response to issue whose scope is too ambitious for current draft:
>
>  
>
> "The committee read and considered this feedback. While it has merit, 
> the committee believes it is _either_ not feasible to implement at 
> this time."
>
>  
>
> Proposed response to issue whose scope is outside P1800:
>
>  
>
> "The committee read and considered this feedback.   The committee 
> believes it is not in the scope or goals of the P1800 project as it 
> was defined & agreed upon by the P1800 WG"
>
>  
>
>  
>
>  
>
>
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> believed to be clean. 

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Thu Apr 2 09:27:26 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Apr 02 2009 - 09:27:45 PDT