[P1800] SV-AC enhancement proposal

Hi Karen, John and all,

 

We have received initial negative feedback from a champion regarding the
SV-AC enhancements, and it seems to us that there is some expectation
gap.

Looking into the initial feedback it seems that maybe the champions are
not involved in the details of the enhancements proposal, as the
feedback was very high-level. 

Furthermore, some comments were questioning if the enhancement are
beyond the level authorized by the P1800 PAR.

 

It is clear to me that we stated those expectation from SV-AC, and it is
the most important delivery of this standard version from Intel
perspective.

I would like to see a clear message to the champions communicating our
expectation. As I said in the last meeting, I'm more concern with the
content of the next standard rather the timeline, still I believe we can
achieve our common goals on time with the needed attention from the
champions to SV-AC enhancement proposals that were delivered (and also
LTL proposal that will soon be delivered).

 

John, is there an action plan that we can take to proactively educate
the champions on the proposals. 

SV-AC has done a great effort to deliver great proposal and at same time
limit the impact on the rest of the language.

I know that SV-AC has participants of multiple companies and maybe they
can become the ambassador to work with the champions in their own
company.

 

Yossi, Intel DR

 


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.