[P1800] 15-November-2007-UNAPPROVED-Meeting-Minutes.doc

From: Brophy, Dennis <dennisb_at_.....>
Date: Thu Jan 31 2008 - 15:26:37 PST
Please forward any corrections to me.

-Dennis 

________________________________

IEEE P1800 SystemVerilog Working Group

UNAPPROVED MINUTES

15 November 2007

8:00 a.m. - 10:00 p.m. PDT

Teleconference

 


1          CALL TO ORDER - INTRODUCTIONS & AFFILIATIONS

The meeting was called to order at 8:00 a.m. PDT.

 

Member DRs/DRAs Present: 

Dave Rich (Mentor Graphics, DR)

Mehdi Mohtashemi (Synopsys, DR)

Yossi Levy (Intel, DR)

Charles Dawson (Cadence, DR)

Neil Korpusik (Sun Microsystems, DR)

Karen Pieper (Accellera, DR)

 

Member DRAs Present:

None

 

Observers:

Stu Sutherland (Sutherland HDL, Observer/Editor)

Shalom Bresticker (Intel, Observer)

Alec Stanculescu (Fintronic USA, Observer)


2          APPROVE AGENDA

A motion (Dave Rich, Mehdi Mohtashemi) was made to approve the agenda
with the addtionof DAC and VHDL.  The motion passed unanimously.

 


3          CALL FOR PATENTS 

Chair Pieper provided the location for the IEEE patent slides.
See: http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-slideset.ppt

 

A motion (Dave Rich, Neil Korpusik) was made to assume the patent policy
has been read by everyone.  The motion passed unaimously.

 

4          Approval of August 30, 2007 Meeting MINutes

A motion was made (Dave Rich, Neil Korpusik) was made to approve the
August 30, 2007 meeting minutes.  The motion passed unanimously.

 

Approval of the October 4, 2007 Meeting Minutes

 

      Neil sent feedback to Dennis. 

      We decided to wait for the update before voting on them.


5          FUNDING, BUDGETING AND FINANCIAL UPDATE

Karen signed the contract between P1800 and IEEE  There was no
additional IEEE fee for managing the funding.  Invoices and quotes to go
out in January, 2008

 

Editor contract - Stu hasn't signed it yet (He didn't receive anything).

 

 

6          Editing update

Stu gave an update.  Not sure if everything was reviewed by the
Technical Committees. He hasn't gone out and checked to see if all the
Mantis items were closed  svbc - has not reviewed all of the changes
[Shalom]- Shalom has suggested to wait until December to do the review
There are 71 Mantis items with a status of "completed" but not yet
closed

 

April 30th pre-ballot draft due (Stu sends it to committees) Draft 5.
Shalom was asking about adding another draft into the schedule.  Karen
saidthere is no money allocated to do another draft.  Stu starts his
updates about 4 weeks prior to the due date since the database keeps
changing.  Needs to make a living - if does a week of work - won't be
paid until much later.  April 1st, or so Stu will start the next draft.

 

Karen said we got some IEEE feedback on draft 4.  There are some items
from Jeita that we need to address.  A couple of them were Editor
related. Stu said the IEEE feedback was mostly generic (e.g. section
versus clause, cant use word must- deprecated).The next review will be
in May from the IEEE

 

7          Schedule Status Update

Dave said svac has sent input to other committees with deadlines.  He
said the svec is too busy to address right now due to the Dec 15th
deadline.

 

In terms of Mantis item 1648, Neil said the deadline for feedback was
from the Working Group.  Karen said the svcc will need some time if the
svec makes changes.

 

Action Request [Neil Korpusik]: Come back with a plan for the next
meeting about how much time the svcc would need.  We need to know what
is a reasonable schedule for svec to work on it and we need to approve
the plan.  It was noted that the bc, ec tend to impact cc more than ac

 

   October 1, 2007     Intermediate draft

                               Proposed IEEE submission for second paid
review

   October 4, 2007     Teleconference 8am

   November 1, 2007    Date for completion of IEEE review

   November 13, 2007   Addressable Mantis Item list freeze in the SV*
committees

                               svac has 4 additional items (due today)

   November 15, 2007   Teleconference 8am

   December 13, 2007   Teleconference 8am

   December 15, 2007   SV-BC, SV-EC freeze (merge and champions issues
ok)

   *January 31, 2008   Teleconference 8am proposed

   February 15, 2008   SV-CC freeze (merge and champions issues ok)

   February 28, 2008   SV-AC freeze / all SV-* freeze

   *February 28, 2008  Teleconference 8am proposed

   March 15, 2008      Champions meeting to approve final features

   *March 27, 2008     Teleconference 8am proposed

   March 30, 2008      Feature freeze in the P1800

   April 30, 2008      Pre-ballot draft available

                               Proposed IEEE submission for third paid
review

   May 5, 2008         Remind entities to become members

   May 21, 2008        Date for completion of IEEE review

   May 30, 2008        Last editing corrections filed in svdb

   June 7, 2008        Open the invitation to ballot

   June 1, 2008        Submit draft for IEEE unpaid ballot review

   June 15, 2008       Champions meeting

   June 30, 2008       P1800 approval due

   July 7, 2008        IEEE unpaid review complete

   July 7, 2008        Close of the invitation to ballot

   July 15, 2008       Balance in the balloting group confirmed

                               Ballot draft available

                               Balloting begins

   August 15, 2008     Ballot closes

   August 30, 2008     Ballot responses available

   September 25, 2008  Two year anniversary for officer elections

   September 30, 2008  Committees respond to ballot responses

   October 15, 2008    Champions meeting

   October 30, 2008    P1800 approval

   November 15, 2008   Recirculation draft  (Was May 31 for 1800-2005)

   December 1, 2008    Recirculation results back

   January 15, 2009    Initiate press release to announce IEEE-SA
Approval

   March 15, 2009      Initiate press release to announce Publication
available

 

It is to our advantage to be done by March 15th.  There is an entity fee
due if we don't finish by then. (~3k)


8          P1800 technical committees and Champions operational update
a.  SV-AC, SV-BC, SV-EC, SV-CC and SV-XC

Mantis items approved by the Champions:

  1556, 1645 - did not pass, will discuss again next time

  The other 91 were approved by the Working Group. 

  The individual motions are described below.

 

  A motion (Neil Korpusik, Charles Dawson) was made to approve items
1-40 of the approved list   The motion passed unanimously. 

 

  A motion (Neil Korpusik, Dave Rich) was made to approve item 41 of the
approved list  The motion passed unanimously.

 

  A motion (Charles Dawson, Neil Korpusik) was made to suspend
discussion on item 42 until the next meeting.  The motion passed.  [Dave
Rich is recorded as voting against the motion.]

 

  A motion (Neil Korpusik, Yossi Levy) was made to approve items 43-44
of the approved list.  The motion passed unanimously.

 

  A motion (Neil Korpusik, Charles Dawson) was made to approve items
45-51 of the approved list.  The motion passed unanimously

 

  A motion (Neil Korpusik, Dave Rich) was made to approve item 52 of the
approved list.  The motion failed.  [Charles, Neil, Dave opposed
motion.]


  More discussion on this item in the next meeting.

 

  A motion (Neil Korpusik, Charles Dawson) was made to approve items
53-54 of the approved list.  The motion passed unanimously

 

  A motion (Neil Korpusik, Charles Dawson) was made to approve items
55-91 of the approved list.  The motion passed unanimously

 

  A motion (Neil Korpusik, Mehdi Mohtashemi) was made to approve items
92-93 of the approved list.  The motion passed unanimously

 

b.  Jeita issues update

Stu said he saw a couple that need to be addressed.  One is keywords and
1826 already exists for this (check with bc).

 

Action Request [Neil Korpusik]: Ensure we have Manis items for any new
JEITA items.

 

We believe that the items on the old Jeita list and the previous ballot
feedback are addressed or in the Mantis items to be resolved lists for
the committees.  Neil to check.  Stu agrees that the two items that the
new Jeita list has that are marked editing are editorial and do not
require action by the committees.

 

c.  2005 ballot issues update

Action Request [Neil Korpusik]: Neil will check on these for next
meeting.

 

9          NEW BUSINESS

DAC

Do we want to do anything at DAC?  Stu wanted to promote the merge (no
more Verilog 1364)  Stu is willing to do a presentation on it.  He was
thinking that Accellera might do this.  The location of DAC 2008 is
Anaheim.

 

We discussed DAC, and potential plans.  It is suggested that we look
into a press event at DAC to discuss the merging of the standard.

 

VHDL use of SystemVerilog 

Karen is the technical co-chair now

The question is, if the design is VHDL can you use all of SystemVerilog?

Yossi said some companies are probably interested.  He thinks that we
shouldn't enhance both languages with same stuff.  If that happened, we
would have another PSL and a mess could result.  It is better to strive
for interoperability.  

 

Karen asked if that was doable.

Chas said he prefers to improve interoperability rather than make
changes to VHDL.  We should promote SV-XC to Accellera.  Karen said
there is some technical interest but not much business interest.

 

Stu said there are two hurdles (they can be overcome though)

   1. interface between the two languages program block would be a 

       good place to have an interface

   2. scheduling semantics (eg program block has own regions)

       Some constructs may not fit well in VHDL (always_ff)

 

  We discussed VHDL/SV interoperability.  It was suggested that we
should promote the SV-XC committee to Accellera.  The issues we should
examine are limiting interoperability to Program 

blocks, loose typing in Verilog TB constructs relative to VHDL, and
scheduling semantics.

 

Dave said he would create a separate PAR for DPI, VPI (svcc)

We should discuss at the time for the next PAR

 

The question was raised if we considered moving the SV-CC to a 'dot'
standard to reduce scheduling issues with SV-EC and SV-BC work at the
end of our schedule.

 

Mehdi asked if the 12/15 proposals voted on by then.  Would we be
allowed to vote later than that? (the answer was NO)

 

Karen said we could try coming back with a schedule to do more after
that, but there is an issue for the svcc to finish its work.  It might
be easier if those proposals don't affect the svcc (Mehdi).  We need to
come back with a schedule as well if we want more time.  But, we will
never be done if we set no deadline.  We need to just stop at some time.

 

The SV-EC is concerned about being able to make the 12/15 freeze date.
It was suggested that if they need additional time, they bring a
schedule including SV-CC impacts to the next P1800 meeting.

 

Chas said that from the list of mantis items, most did not include
proposals.  He wants those on the svcc list however.  The SV-CC activity
list did not include items that currently have proposals. Charles will
send out that list.

 

Action Request [Charles Dawson]: Send out the Mantis list.

 

10        NEXT MEETING (ANNOUNCE DATE, TIME, AND LOCATION, IF KNOWN)

December 13, 2007     P1800 Meeting teleconference 8am PST

January 31, 2008         Teleconference 8am PST

Feb      28, 2008  (DVCON is the previous week)

Mar      27, 2008

 

11        ADJOURNMENT

A motion (Neil Korpusik) was made to adjourn the meeting. Having reached
the end of the agenda and not other business before the committee the
chair called the meeting closed at 9:51 a.m. PST.

 


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Thu Jan 31 15:28:20 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jan 31 2008 - 15:28:25 PST