RE: [P1800] IEEE SA RevCom Update

Dennis,

So, does this mean that those who approved the last ballot should, or must,
vote again, or will our last vote carry forward to this recirculation
ballot?

Stu
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Stuart Sutherland
stuart@sutherland-hdl.com
+1-503-692-0898
  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ieee1800@eda.org [mailto:owner-ieee1800@eda.org] 
> On Behalf Of Brophy, Dennis
> Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 2:38 PM
> To: ieee1800@eda.org
> Subject: RE: [P1800] IEEE SA RevCom Update
> 
> Or to more appropriately write the last paragraph:
>  
> This means a 10 day recirculation is being started today so 
> that when RevCom meets later in October, they will see that 
> we have satisfied all outstanding procedural requirements to 
> allow them to approve the standards.
>  
>  -Dennis
>  
> ________________________________
> 
> From: owner-ieee1800@eda.org [mailto:owner-ieee1800@eda.org] 
> On Behalf Of Brophy, Dennis
> Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 2:35 PM
> To: ieee1800@eda.org
> Subject: [P1800] IEEE SA RevCom Update
> 
> 
> Dear SystemVerilog Working Group,
> 
>  
> 
> As a member of RevCom, I wanted to give the team an update on 
> the approval of P1800 and P1364 and what transpired today at 
> RevCom.  RevCom has postponed approval until the names of the 
> negative balloters are officially part of a recirculation 
> package so all balloters can know with certainty who voted 
> negative and for what.  This is being done to satisfy an 
> American National Standards Institute (ANSI) requirement so 
> that P1800 and P1364 can automatically become ANSI standards. 
> 
>   
> 
> This means a 10 day recirculation is being started today so 
> that when RevCom meets later in October.  At that next 
> meeting they we see that we have satisfied all outstanding 
> procedural requirements to allow them to approve the standards.  
> 
>   
> 
> Regards,
> 
>  
> 
> Dennis
> 
> Member, IEEE SA RevCom
> 
>