RE: [P1800] RE: 11 October 2004 Unapproved Meeting Minutes

Hi Shalom,
We have the schedule review in the agenda for tomorrow.
We shall go over the schedule line by line to make sure there are no
confusions or mis-interpretations.

Thanks,

--- Johny.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ieee1800@eda.org [mailto:owner-ieee1800@eda.org] On Behalf
Of Shalom.Bresticker@freescale.com
Sent: Sunday, November 21, 2004 11:00 PM
To: Brophy, Dennis
Cc: ieee1800@eda.org
Subject: [P1800] RE: 11 October 2004 Unapproved Meeting Minutes

OK, thanks.

In discussions and correspondence with various people, I have discovered
significant differences in interpretations or understanding of the P1800
schedule.

Thus, I request that the schedule be clarified in an explicit and
unambiguous way.

Thanks,
Shalom

On Sun, 21 Nov 2004, Brophy, Dennis wrote:

> Shalom,
>
> Let's make clarification of this part of our meeting on Monday.
>
> -Dennis
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: shalom@eagle.msil.sps.mot.com
> > [mailto:shalom@eagle.msil.sps.mot.com] On Behalf Of
> > Shalom.Bresticker@freescale.com
> > Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2004 3:28 AM
> > To: Brophy, Dennis
> > Cc: ieee1800@eda.org
> > Subject: Re: 11 October 2004 Unapproved Meeting Minutes
> >
> > Thank you.
> >
> > But something is still not clear.
> >
> > > The timeline that we are working off of is the basis to determine
> > > slack and schedule issues like the cutoff date. If we were
> > to go past
> > > the date we would need to revisit the timeline.
> >
> > Thank you, I understand that.
> > But I repeat my original question:
> >
> > > "The question was raised as to when the cutoff for work
> > would need to
> > > be. Would it need to be December 2004 or could it be March
> > 2005? After
> > > discussion, it was noted that a March 2005 cutoff would
> > permit us to
> > > meet the DAC completion timeline."
> > >
> > > Was a decision made?
> >
> > The minutes say there was a discussion and it was "noted that ...".
> > The minutes do NOT say that the group DECIDED to set a cutoff
> > of March instead of December for the ETF/BTF work.
> >
> > The question is, when ETF and BTF plan their work, can they
> > assume they have until March to finish or not?
> >
> > Also, does "March" mean March 1 or March 31?
> >
> > Sorry if it sounds picky, but it is still ambiguous, and of
> > non-trivial importance.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Shalom
> >
> > --
> > Shalom Bresticker Shalom.Bresticker
> > @freescale.com
> > Design & Verification Methodology Tel:
> > +972 9 9522268
> > Freescale Semiconductor Israel, Ltd. Fax:
> > +972 9 9522890
> > POB 2208, Herzlia 46120, ISRAEL Cell:
> > +972 50 5441478
> >
> > [ ]Freescale Internal Use Only [ ]Freescale Confidential
> > Proprietary
> >
> >
>

-- 
Shalom Bresticker                        Shalom.Bresticker
@freescale.com
Design & Verification Methodology                    Tel: +972 9
9522268
Freescale Semiconductor Israel, Ltd.                 Fax: +972 9
9522890
POB 2208, Herzlia 46120, ISRAEL                     Cell: +972 50
5441478
  
[ ]Freescale Internal Use Only      [ ]Freescale Confidential
Proprietary