[sv-dc] UDN, UDT

Building on what Brad wrote:

SV-DC discussions extensively use the abbreviations UDN and UDT (and even UDR) without their being defined, and they seem freely interchanged and misused.

The LRM defines neither of those abbreviations. The terms "user-defined type" (for typedef, class, covergroup, ...) and "user-defined nettype" appear.

Please define clearly and precisely the terms you are going to use and then be consistent.

Otherwise, it is very confusing.

For example, "@(UDT)".

Thanks,
Shalom


From: owner-sv-dc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-dc@eda.org] On Behalf Of Brad Pierce
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2015 18:37
To: sv-dc@eda.org
Subject: [sv-dc] RE: Minutes from SV-DC meeting on 2015.01.23

>Another request is to have parts of a user-defined type (UDT) in the sensitivity list.

"user-defined type" is the topic of 6.18, 6.22, as discussed in http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=5178 . And "user-defined nettype" (UDN) is discussed in 6.6.7.

But I think the request is not about either types or nettypes, but instead about nets of a user-defined nettype, specifically, that such a net be allowed whole in a sensitivity netlist, instead of listing all the fields.

-- Brad

[In reply to http://www.eda-twiki.org/sv-dc/hm/0540.html .]

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner<http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
believed to be clean.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.