Hi Ian, hi Scott,
I think it is a great idea to have regular meetings for discussing issues of interest.
A specific goal might be e.g. to develop a methodology for CM-insertion/resolution/synchronization
of mixed nets that transport electrical, real/aggregate and digital data.
Another (longterm-)issue might be to brainstorm about a clean integration of ASVA within analog Verilog-AMS blocks.
Best regards,
Achim
----- Original Message -----
From: Ian Wilson
To: Little Scott-B11206
Cc: sv-dc@eda.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2010 10:06 PM
Subject: Re: [sv-dc] SV-DC roadmap update
I agree that it would be a good idea to have a regular sync-up meeting.
Can we come up with a specific goal rather than to discuss issues of
interest?
--ian
----------------------------------
Ian M Wilson
Architect
Berkeley Design Automation
Office: 408-496-6600 x238
Cell: 714-272-7040
ian.wilson@berkeley-da.com
http://www.berkeley-da.com
----------------------------------
True SPICE accuracy, 5X-20X faster
Don't Be Left Behind!
----------------------------------
Little Scott-B11206 wrote:
Hi all:
After attending the recent Verilog-AMS and SV-DC meetings and thinking
about the happenings there it seems to me that it would be nice to have
a regularly scheduled sync-up meeting to ensure that both groups are
aware of each other's progress and technical issues of common interest.
As such, I think we should add the following statement to the
"Relationship to Verilog-AMS" section of the roadmap. Thoughts?
Subgroups of the Verilog-AMS and SV-DC committees will meet regularly to
discuss technical issues of interest between the two committees.
Thanks,
Scott
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Tue Sep 14 13:34:07 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Sep 14 2010 - 13:34:08 PDT