Hi Martin:
These changes seem fine to me. I have made the suggested changes to the
roadmap document.
Thanks,
Scott
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin O'Leary [mailto:oleary@cadence.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 8:04 PM
> To: Little Scott-B11206
> Cc: sv-dc@eda.org
> Subject: roadmap corrections
>
>
> Scott,
> Looking over the roadmap, could you make the following
> corrections/updates?
> Thanks,
> -Martin
>
> * There is a reference to the "2012 PAR" in the last section. There
is
> no 2012 PAR. The P1800 PAR has an expiration date of December 31,
> 2014. The fact that the WG is aiming for an updated standard in the
> 2012 timeframe is irrelevant to the nature of the PAR. What should be
> referred to is the "2012 Standard" or "2012 Updated Standard" or
> something like that.
>
> * the full facts about the VAMS-SV merger are not described - it says;
> " SV-DC is also aware that work to merge
> SystemVerilog and Verilog-AMS has started, although completion of the
> merger is expected to take at least three years."
>
> It would be more accurate to say that;
> "SV-DC is also aware that work to merge
> SystemVerilog and Verilog-AMS has started and a draft document is due
> for completion at the end of 2011. At that point, the draft is
intended
> to be donated to IEEE for inclusion in the SV standardization
process."
>
>
>
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Tue Sep 14 07:23:52 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Sep 14 2010 - 07:23:56 PDT