RE: [sv-ac] Call to vote. Due August 30 (reminder)

SVDB 2205 _Y_Yes ___No

http://www.eda-stds.org/mantis/view.php?id=2205

http://www.eda-stds.org/mantis/file_download.php?file_id=4489&type=bug

SVDB 2571 _Y_Yes ___No

http://www.eda-stds.org/mantis/view.php?id=2571
<http://www.eda-stds.org/mantis/view.php?id=2571>

http://www.eda-stds.org/mantis/file_download.php?file_id=4414&type=bug

SVDB 3035 ___Yes _X_No

http://www.eda-stds.org/mantis/view.php?id=3035
<http://www.eda-stds.org/mantis/view.php?id=3035>

http://www.eda-stds.org/mantis/file_download.php?file_id=4485&type=bug

I agree with John - we need to consider the impact of this on the new
procedural constructs that we are going to add and make sure that the
sampling rules for checker arguments don't become confusing or
complicated.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.