RE: [sv-ac] Call to vote. Due July 12

IMHO, the final decision of font selection is for the editor, with
guidance from the committees. In this case, the font of 'wait' should
match the font of 'expect' - both bold Courier since they are referring
to specific keywords, and not in a context requiring understanding the
meaning behind the keyword, nor in an overloaded use of terminology.

From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf Of
Bresticker, Shalom
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2010 2:02 AM
To: Kulshrestha, Manisha; Korchemny, Dmitry; Havlicek John-R8AAAU;
sv-ac@eda.org
Subject: RE: [sv-ac] Call to vote. Due July 12

We don't.

Since the LRM is inconsistent and it is preferable to make 'wait'
distinctive, I think either italic or bold Courier is ok.

While there are places where it has the regular font, it is better to
make it different.

Shalom

From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf Of
Kulshrestha, Manisha
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2010 11:53 AM
To: Korchemny, Dmitry; Havlicek John-R8AAAU; sv-ac@eda.org
Subject: RE: [sv-ac] Call to vote. Due July 12

Hi,

Even I am not sure which font is correct for 'wait'. In the LRM, I see
three different ways to write it: italic, bold courier and regular.

But I see no harm in making it italic as there are places in the LRM
where it is italic.

Do we have any style document for this type of thing ?

Thanks.

Manisha

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited
 
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and 
dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is
believed to be clean. 
-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.