Hi Srini,
This should have already be captured by "Enhancements in concurrent assertions and local variables".
Dmitry
From: Srinivasan Venkataramanan [mailto:svenka3@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 12:09 PM
To: Korchemny, Dmitry
Cc: sv-ac@eda.org
Subject: Re: [sv-ac] SV AC feedback for the coming PAR
Hello,
Please add:
1. Allow run time variables as cycle_delay
Thanks
Srini
www.cvcblr.com<http://www.cvcblr.com>
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 12:17 AM, Korchemny, Dmitry <dmitry.korchemny@intel.com<mailto:dmitry.korchemny@intel.com>> wrote:
Hi all,
I collected the following feedback from SV-AC:
* Relax restrictions imposed on checkers and support module-like code in checkers
* Reduce restrictions on where checkers and concurrent assertions may be used (functions, tasks, c lasses)
* Enhance assertion system functions
* Enhance type system to allow generic integral type and explicit type compatibility check
* Allow real data types in concurrent assertions. Integration with VerilogVMS
* Introduce temporal coverage - tighter integration
* Enhance concurrent assertions, including local variables
Please, let me know if your requirement hasn't been captured.
Thanks,
Dmitry
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner<http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is believed to be clean. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Tue Feb 23 03:09:38 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Feb 23 2010 - 03:09:46 PST