Stu, I agree with you. I also note that in the ballot draft, the text in question is now in section F.3.4.3.5. As far as I can see, the issue was relevant to Draft 7, and fixed in 7a. Regards, Shalom ________________________________ From: owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Stuart Sutherland Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2009 10:54 PM To: sv-ac@server.eda.org Subject: [sv-ac] Question on Mantis 2486 SV-AC Mantis 2486 is in the "editor" status for me to implement. The bug notes indicate that the changes did not make it into the ballot draft, and need to be implemented in the recirculation draft. It appears to me that the changes specified in the proposal ARE in the ballot draft. Is there some other change, or a correction to how it was implemented, that I am supposed to make? Stu ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Stuart Sutherland Sutherland HDL, Inc. 22805 SW 92nd Place Tualatin, OR 97062 stuart@sutherland-hdl.com (503) 692-0898 www.sutherland-hdl.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- We train engineers to be SystemVerilog Wizards! --------------------------------------------------------------------- -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner<http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is believed to be clean. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Wed Jun 24 13:08:15 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jun 24 2009 - 13:08:46 PDT