[sv-ac] RE: Draft 7 cross-review (reminder)

OK, I've reviewed 16.8-16.10.  A few minor notes, which I've added as bugnotes to 1900:

- 16.8, bulleted list at start of section:  since we are enumerating places where a sequence can be defined, we need to include
    -- A checker

- 16.8.1, in text just before "delay_arg_example", the keyword "shortint" is separated across two lines with a dash.  Is it legal to split a keyword like this, or do we need to keep it one one line?

- 16.10:  This discussion of local variables in sequences and properties occurs before we have introduced properties, which are coming in section 16.13, and thus might be hard to follow for someone not already familiar with the standard.  I think 16.10 should be moved after 16.13, in other words renumbering the sections as:
    16.10 -> 16.13   16.11->16.10 16.12->16.11  16.13->16.12.
If this is too much change at this stage, alternatively we should include a reference to 16.13 when properties are first mentioned, in the first sentence of 16.10.

________________________________
From: owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Korchemny, Dmitry
Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2008 3:06 AM
To: sv-ac@server.eda.org
Subject: [sv-ac] Draft 7 cross-review (reminder)

Hi all,

Please complete your cross-review and send your notes if you haven't already done so.


*         YF: 14, 16.5, 16.5

*         EC: 16 (beginning) - 16.4

*         ES: 16.8-16.10

*         JH: 16.11-16.14

*         LP: 16.15

*         DK: 16.16 - 16 (end)

*         MK: 16.6, Clause 20, Annex Q

*         BT: Clauses 37, 39, Annex O

*         TT: Annex A

*         DB: 16.7, Annex F

Thanks,
Dmitry

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.


--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner<http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
believed to be clean.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.