RE: [sv-ac] notes from SV-AC meeting 2008-10-06

Hi Karen,

 

We have voted on the following Mantis items:

 

.2478 Clock flow subclause is not consistent with multiclocked property
definition

.2482 Need to swap F.3.4.6 and F.3.4.7

.2486: Scope of Annex F definition of "specify" is not clear

.2492: typo in 16.9.10

. 2489: Wrong font

.2490: use of "satisfies" instead of "tightly satisfies"

 

All items except 2478 are pure editorial, most of them are just typos.
Since they could not be associated in a natural way with existing Mantis
items we opened new Mantis items to keep these issues well documented. I
marked in the note for each Mantis item resolution that it was an
editorial issue. Instead of opening these Mantis items we could  have
sent an email to Stu directly, but then it would be difficult to follow
up.

 

What is the right way to handle these issues?

 

As for 2478 is concerned, it is not an editorial issue, but unless it is
fixed (the fix is to delete several lines), the LRM will be
contradictory, therefore we consider this fix very important. I have
already notified Neil about it.

 

Thanks,

Dmitry

 

From: Karen Pieper [mailto:karen_l_pieper@yahoo.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2008 3:16 PM
To: Korchemny, Dmitry
Subject: Re: [sv-ac] notes from SV-AC meeting 2008-10-06

 

Hi, Dmitry,

 

Where is the SV-AC?  I saw that you've taken several votes.  How much
text do you need to change at this point?  I'm trying to figure out
whether or not to start the ballot part, or to hold off until after the
next P1800 meeting.  There isn't a lot of change we can make once I
submit the standard to the IEEE.

 

Thanks,

 

Karen

 

 

----- Original Message ----
From: "Korchemny, Dmitry" <dmitry.korchemny@intel.com>
To: "Kulshrestha, Manisha" <Manisha_Kulshrestha@mentor.com>;
sv-ac@server.eda.org
Sent: Tuesday, October 7, 2008 12:34:06 AM
Subject: RE: [sv-ac] notes from SV-AC meeting 2008-10-06

HI Manisha,

 

Sure, please, continue with your review.

 

John, Lisa, and Yaniv, since Manisha is reviewing her assignments, there
is no need to review the sections you volunteered yesterday.

 

Thanks,

 Dmitry

 

From: Kulshrestha, Manisha [mailto:Manisha_Kulshrestha@mentor.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2008 9:31 AM
To: Korchemny, Dmitry; sv-ac@server.eda.org
Subject: RE: [sv-ac] notes from SV-AC meeting 2008-10-06

 

Hi Dimitry,

 

I am currently reviewing my assignments for cross review. I saw that you
have reassigned them. Should I continue with my review  ?

 

Manisha

 

From: owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org] On
Behalf Of Korchemny, Dmitry
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2008 2:19 AM
To: sv-ac@server.eda.org
Subject: [sv-ac] notes from SV-AC meeting 2008-10-06

 

Hi Folks:

 

My notes from today's meeting are attached.

Please let me know if changes are required.

 

Dmitry

 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited
  
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and 
dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is

believed to be clean. 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited
 
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and 
dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is

believed to be clean. 

 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.