As part of looking at 1757 implementation, I noticed a problem in the implementation of 2100. At 16.17.1 It says: - The set of semantic leading clocks of sync_accept_on(b) q is the set of semantic leading clocks of q. - The set of semantic leading clocks of sync_reject_on(b) q is the set of semantic leading clocks of q. but 2100 says: - The set of semantic leading clocks of sync_accept_on(b)q is {inherited}. - The set of semantic leading clocks of sync_reject_on(b)q is {inherited}. I have not found any other issues with 1757 Doron --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Mon Jun 23 01:56:46 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jun 23 2008 - 01:57:40 PDT