I think that all the changes should be relative to Draft5. Dmitry ________________________________ From: owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Bustan, Doron Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 10:30 AM To: sv-ac@server.eda.org Subject: [sv-ac] Coloring question Hi, I am reviewing the 1757 implementation now. Most of the implemented text comes from 2100, which is fine. What bothers me is that much of the red stroke out, mark text from 1757/1932 that is removed and not text from D5. I don't think it makes a big difference but should it be this way? Doron --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is believed to be clean. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Mon Jun 23 00:38:15 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jun 23 2008 - 00:38:24 PDT