Hi, Sorry for missing the last two meetings. I looked at the comments and here are my two cents: >> Untyped arguments >> John: There were some poor text choices in 1549. >> Gord wants to enable large-scale designs, separate compilations >> Do we really need substitution semantics? >> What happens when expression passed to untyped argument? As far as I remember (and it been a while) the main motivation for the substituting semantics was to avoid defining "when" a call to a sub-property/sub-sequence occurs. It could be that I am still under the 921 trauma, but have the impression that this will be hard. Doron --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Tue Apr 29 23:48:47 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Apr 29 2008 - 23:49:39 PDT