Hi, I'm attaching (since those Mantis items are in the resolved state and I can't upload) new versions of the proposals 2173 and 2100 They include fixes to feedback from Shalom and John: 2100: (Shalom) "troughout" -> "throughout" "except for it evaluates" -> "except that it evaluates" 2173: "I don't think the BNF footnote is needed. Regular cases have the same restriction with such a BNF footnote." (Shalom) - I removed the BNF footnote on more than one default case, there is a sentence about this in 16.12.16. Addressed comments from John: 1. extra semicolon in assertion statement -A possible solution is to have both property_spec and property_statement_spec, where the former is unchanged, i.e. property_spec ::= [clocking_event] [disable iff (expression_or_dist)] property_expr and the latter requires a property_statement in place of the property_expr. Then use property_spec in the assertion statements (unchanged) and use property_statement_spec in the property declaration, getting rid of the explicit semicolon there. 2. change the definition of vacuity to include n case items with optional default in one paragraph 3. change in the multi clocks section (16.15.1) the default to be optional Yaniv -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Mar 16 2008 - 02:47:46 PDT