[sv-ac] RE: question on vpiAssertSysKill

From: Bassam Tabbara <Bassam.Tabbara_at_.....>
Date: Wed Jan 23 2008 - 13:16:20 PST
Hi Lisa,
 
Yes I believe an error of sorts -- the terminology "considers ...
unterminated" is misleading (particularly with recent additions) and
should be changed to "discards ..." like the others.
 
Thx.
-Bassam.
 

________________________________

From: Lisa Piper [mailto:piper@cadence.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 12:29 PM
To: Bassam Tabbara
Cc: sv-ac@eda.org
Subject: question on vpiAssertSysKill



Bassam,

Is this a mistake, saying that vpiAssertionSysKill (38.5.1)  does not
terminate assertions in progress?  If not , then what is the difference
in vpiAssertionSysOff and vpiAssertionSysKill?  This is also
inconsistent with Off versus Kill for $assertoff/kill and
vpiAssertionKill.


- vpiAssertionSysOff disables any further assertions from being started.
Assertions already

executing are not affected.

- vpiAssertionSysKill considers all attempts in progress as unterminated
and disables any further

assertions from being started.

Lisa


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Wed Jan 23 13:18:49 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jan 23 2008 - 13:19:07 PST