Re: [sv-ac] ballot result for 1769

Hi Ed:

There was also the following comment from Shalom Bresticker:

   [SB]
   
   The LRM also says in 3.10,
   "Although this standard defines the results of compilation and
   elaboration, the compilation and elaboration steps are not required to
   be distinct phases in an implementation. Throughout this standard the
   terms compilation, compile and compiler normally refer to the combined
   compilation and elaboration process. So, for example, when the standard
   refers to a "compile time error", an implementation is permitted to
   report the error at any time prior to the start of simulation."
   
   But it would be confusing to use 'elaboration' and then use
   'compilation' in the more general sense.

I mistakenly put this comment with the 2150 result rather than the
1769 result.

Has this also been addressed?

J.H.

> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
> Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:03:35 -0800
> X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
> Thread-Topic: [sv-ac] ballot result for 1769
> Thread-Index: Achc81YfGfqpq40uREaOblrAh62OuAALVDNA
> From: "Eduard Cerny" <Eduard.Cerny@synopsys.com>
> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Jan 2008 18:03:40.0004 (UTC) FILETIME=[1E14C240:01C85D21]
> 
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> 
> ------_=_NextPart_001_01C85D21.1D8CACC0
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> 	charset="us-ascii"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> 
> Hello,
> 
> please find attached a new version of the proposal, following the
> friendly amendments and the discussion in the meeting today.
> 
> I also posted the proposal on Mantis.
> 
> Best regards,
> ed
> 
> 

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.