RE: [sv-ac] ballot result for 1769

The comment was on the previous  version.
Th new version indeed does not mention compilation.

Regards,
Shalom 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eduard Cerny [mailto:Eduard.Cerny@synopsys.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 9:58 PM
> To: john.havlicek@freescale.com; Eduard.Cerny@synopsys.COM
> Cc: sv-ac@eda.org; Bresticker, Shalom
> Subject: RE: [sv-ac] ballot result for 1769
> 
> The proposal uses "elaboration" only (unless I missed it 
> somewhere when editing).
> ed
>  
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: John Havlicek [mailto:john.havlicek@freescale.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 2:38 PM
> > To: Eduard.Cerny@synopsys.COM
> > Cc: sv-ac@eda.org; shalom.bresticker@intel.com
> > Subject: Re: [sv-ac] ballot result for 1769
> > 
> > Hi Ed:
> > 
> > There was also the following comment from Shalom Bresticker:
> > 
> >    [SB]
> >    
> >    The LRM also says in 3.10,
> >    "Although this standard defines the results of compilation and
> >    elaboration, the compilation and elaboration steps are 
> not required 
> > to
> >    be distinct phases in an implementation. Throughout this 
> standard 
> > the
> >    terms compilation, compile and compiler normally refer to the 
> > combined
> >    compilation and elaboration process. So, for example, when the 
> > standard
> >    refers to a "compile time error", an implementation is 
> permitted to
> >    report the error at any time prior to the start of simulation."
> >    
> >    But it would be confusing to use 'elaboration' and then use
> >    'compilation' in the more general sense.
> > 
> > I mistakenly put this comment with the 2150 result rather than the
> > 1769 result.
> > 
> > Has this also been addressed?
> > 
> > J.H.
> > 
> > > X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
> > > Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
> > > Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:03:35 -0800
> > > X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
> > > Thread-Topic: [sv-ac] ballot result for 1769
> > > Thread-Index: Achc81YfGfqpq40uREaOblrAh62OuAALVDNA
> > > From: "Eduard Cerny" <Eduard.Cerny@synopsys.com>
> > > X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Jan 2008 18:03:40.0004 (UTC)
> > FILETIME=[1E14C240:01C85D21]
> > > 
> > > This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> > > 
> > > ------_=_NextPart_001_01C85D21.1D8CACC0
> > > Content-Type: text/plain;
> > > 	charset="us-ascii"
> > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> > > 
> > > Hello,
> > > 
> > > please find attached a new version of the proposal, following the 
> > > friendly amendments and the discussion in the meeting today.
> > > 
> > > I also posted the proposal on Mantis.
> > > 
> > > Best regards,
> > > ed
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.