Hi Erik, Some more comments/questions: "For a cover property statement that appears inside a procedural loop, the measurement of "number of times attempted" shall count each possible set of iterator values as one attempt. Success or vacuous success shall be measured and reported for each set of iterator values, as if each were a separate attempt to execute the coverage statement." 1. I would say "cover" instead of "cover property" since there exists "cover property" and "cover sequence", both of which are "cover". 2. what happens if I put an immediate assertion in a loop? Does the attempt count need to be consistent with that of a concurrent assertion in a loop? 3. This is not clear. I suggest adding the word SET where shown: "Success or vacuous success shall be measured and reported for each set of iterator values, as if each set were a separate attempt to execute the coverage statement." Lisa ________________________________ From: Seligman, Erik [mailto:erik.seligman@intel.com] Sent: Friday, December 07, 2007 12:12 PM To: Lisa Piper; sv-ac@eda.org Cc: Korchemny, Dmitry Subject: Updated proposal for 1995 (concurrent assertions in loops) posted I added some comments in the coverage section, and a VPI change, in response to Lisa's concerns. Erik Seligman Formal Verification Architect Corporate Design Solutions Design Technology and Solutions Intel Corporation M.S. JF4-402 2111 NE 25th Ave Hillsboro, OR 97124 Phone: (503) 712-3134 -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Fri Dec 7 10:04:41 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Dec 07 2007 - 10:06:30 PST