RE: [sv-ac] 1758 passed - updated proposal

From: Eduard Cerny <Eduard.Cerny_at_.....>
Date: Fri Oct 05 2007 - 06:35:25 PDT
Shalom,

I thought that the rewrite defines the order in terms of the other
operators and parenthesizing.  Isn't that enough? defining it separately
could make it perhaps more confusing.

best...
ed

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On 
> Behalf Of Bresticker, Shalom
> Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 2:42 AM
> To: sv-ac@eda-stds.org
> Subject: RE: [sv-ac] 1758 passed - updated proposal
> 
> Ed, 
> 
> > I did not yet review the proposed change to the text of 11.4.7.
> 
> I think the new text to 11.4.7 should describe the relative precedence
> of the new operators.
> 
> Thanks,
> Shalom
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Intel Israel (74) Limited
> 
> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
> the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
> 
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
> 
> 
> 

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Fri Oct 5 06:35:41 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Oct 05 2007 - 06:36:23 PDT