Hi John, yes, I think it should be the same as in te case of the other immediate statements. If you can change it, I'd appreciate it... Thank you, ed > -----Original Message----- > From: John Havlicek [mailto:john.havlicek@freescale.com] > Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 8:35 PM > To: Eduard.Cerny@synopsys.COM > Cc: john.havlicek@freescale.com; eduard.cerny@synopsys.COM; > sv-ac@eda-stds.org > Subject: Re: question about 1729 > > Hi Ed: > > Should I fix it so that the pass statement for an immediate cover > executes immediately? > > J.H. > > > X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 > > Content-class: urn:content-classes:message > > Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 17:27:19 -0700 > > Thread-Topic: question about 1729 > > Thread-Index: Acf/0c3Erd6RiTKsSX6b1C81C/CvJwAAiHiw > > From: "Eduard Cerny" <Eduard.Cerny@synopsys.com> > > Cc: <sv-ac@eda-stds.org> > > X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Sep 2007 00:27:20.0808 (UTC) > FILETIME=[00646E80:01C7FFD4] > > > > Hi John, > > Hmm... that looks more like a copy & paste error. > > ed > > =20 > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: John Havlicek [mailto:john.havlicek@freescale.com]=20 > > > Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 8:11 PM > > > To: eduard.cerny@synopsys.COM > > > Cc: john.havlicek@freescale.com; sv-ac@eda-stds.org > > > Subject: question about 1729 > > >=20 > > > Hi Ed: > > >=20 > > > Why does 1729 say that the action block for an immediate assert > > > or assume executes immediately while the action block for an=20 > > > immediate cover executes in the Reactive region? > > >=20 > > > Was this intentional? > > >=20 > > > J.H. > > >=20 > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Tue Sep 25 18:42:26 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Sep 25 2007 - 18:42:40 PDT